The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Woolworths Limited. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woolworths Mobile[edit]

Woolworths Mobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial coverage only. Article created by probable COI editor. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH AusLondonder (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 09:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Woolworths Limited. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Woolworths Limited.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  22:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree - Redirect to Woolworths Limited and include noteworthy info there Clare. (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment this was declined in G11 some news search results have Woolworths Mobile in the title. Looks like newbie edit, talk page has a history of declines in AfC, I don't see any warnings about COI, just the in the AfC notice. There are references out there and tangentially related blurb from the Daily Mail could probably be cut. 009o9^Disclosure(Talk) 09:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.