The result was speedy keep. Nom withdraw, any further issues can be resolved on article talk. (non-admin closure) Dysklyver 15:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is promotional, entirely primary sourced, and needs so much work that it ought to be deleted or moved to draftspace. A WP:BEFORE reveals a number of passing mentions, but I am struggling to find any substantial coverage. Dysklyver 21:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
This article doesn't seem any more or less self-promotional than any other non-profit's wiki page. Insofar as it is, it ought to be easy enough to clean up various non-objective assessments. --Jon rainheart (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
With all due respect, the issues are still there, the section titled 'Initiatives' is both unreferenced and filled with external links to the organizations own website, I am not aware that government departments and non-profits have some special exemption to our rules regarding the promotional nature of mission statements, almost word for word paraphrasing of a press release in the lead, and wording like 'Under the leadership of'. That said, I will run over it myself since I reckon this can be kept as a basic article now. Dysklyver 15:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)