The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There was no AFD tags applied to the NWA Virginia Junior Heavyweight Championship so it would have to be nominated on a new AFD discussion. --JForget 00:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Wrestling Coalition[edit]

World Wrestling Coalition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG as there are no available third party sources to help establish notability. I'd also like to add the following championship to this AfD, as it isn't independently notable of the company and hasn't been defended in a notable promotion. Nikki♥311 01:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• NWA Virginia Junior Heavyweight Championship

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 01:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, it seems that the title included may have been a part of a different promotion with the same name, but the fact that it hasn't been defended in a notable promotion still stands. Nikki♥311 02:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both. I think this and the championship are quite notable enough for articles. -- ISLANDERS27 06:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is your evidence and/or reasoning? Nikki♥311 17:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, it may get broadcast on TV soon. They have venues, don't they? -- ISLANDERS27 04:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • What may happen in the future doesn't effect the notability now. See WP:CRYSTAL. Nikki♥311 04:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable. Any fed can bring in outsiders if they have a bit of cash. Too many redlinks for my liking. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 07:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with Rick and the nom. !! Justa Punk !! 04:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Under G4 - recreation of article deleted via AfD. GetDumb 04:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.