The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. A Train^talk 19:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

X2vnc[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software does not appear notable. The article has been sourced only to its own homepage for around a decade, and is written as a how-to guide for the most part. I can find no substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. Reyk _YO! 11:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up blog entries and forum posts related to the software, but no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Seems somewhat unclear if anyone has checked out the (Google) Scholar link above where X2vnc's different approach seems to be noted.Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.