The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DeVerm's !vote is just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Cullen328's !vote has been refuted enough for a slight consensus to delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

XE166[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product, reads very close to advertising. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 11:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- It's just advertising. Zero notability. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advert provides no evidence for notability. Edison (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Electronics Weekly published an article about this family of devices on November 15, 2007. Many other electronics publications have also covered this product line. Lack of references in the article does not mean that references do not exist. They do, and the solution is normal editing to NPOV language, not deletion. Cullen328 (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Spam Electronics Weekly and similar mags just reprint product announcements. EEng (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Electronics Weekly is a reliable publication going back decades with professional fact checking and editorial oversight, published by a company with a long and respectable history. Calling it "spam" is inaccurate and unfair, in my view. Cullen328 (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I said this article is spam, not E.W. Jeesh! EEng (talk) 01:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Infinion is a Siemens spin-off company with 43,000 employees; they really don't need to create advertisements or spam on WP. This article is about a microcontroller just like PIC microcontroller. Deleting this article would be the same as deleting an article about a new Intel CPU etc. --DeVerm (talk) 01:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.