< 4 February | 6 February > |
---|
The result was speedy delete (G5). Page created by a disruptive sock of a user in violation of an indefinite block. –MuZemike 01:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Burma as a setting for Rambo movies, delete as not encyclopedic. Melaen (talk) 23:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. walk victor falk talk 23:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not appear to be notable enough to warrant an article on its own. Strikerforce (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. A7 Ronhjones (Talk) 23:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable by the standards outlined in WP:CLUB and WP:NSOCCER Xorkl000 (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Lords of the Nine Hells. T. Canens (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A combination of summary material from multiple D&D guidebooks does not show notability. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that the character is in multiple sources and articles shows that it is a noteworthy character in itself. Examples of characters who exist in multiple articles that get their own pages is extensive, including Grima Wormtounge (LotR), the Tholians (Star Trek), and Jesus. You need more evidence of lack of noteworthiness. (talk) 10:04 6 February 2012 (PST)
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage in independent sources. Allmusic links don't review or discuss the album at all. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. No independent reliable sources provided to demonstrate notability of this project. No relevant reliable sources found for Gibson Teo. RJaguar3 | u | t 20:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Actor Fails WP:GNG The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete . The consensus below is clear that most of the references provided do not rise to the level of WP:Reliable sources.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non-notable programming language. The only hits on Google for this language aside from the main website are blogs discussing syntax and a question or two on StackOverflow. Notability tag for nearly 2 years. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
More than 100 questions in StackOverflow where Nemerle is quoted. --Sergey Shandar (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://rsdn.ru/article/nemerle/NemerleIntro.xml http://rsdn.ru/article/nemerle/nemerleMacros.xml http://rsdn.ru/article/nemerle/SimpleReporter.xml http://rsdn.ru/article/nemerle/Amplifier.xml http://rsdn.ru/article/nemerle/NemerleStingFormating.xml http://rsdn.ru/summary/4531.xml and so forth.
There are a lot of references in press: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Nemerle%22 Nemerle is officially supported by Mono (which I hope is enough notable for you?) Nemerle is included in several Linux distributions Nemerle is not even an academic language, it is used in industry.
All these things does render a language as notable according to Wikipedia standards.
I hope that you have good intentions in mind but what you are doing here is *vandalism*. There are a lot really *interestring* academic programming languages here which will likely fall under your "non-notable" criteria. As a result Wikipedia will loose a lot of interesting content.
I am convincing you to stop playing in this "notability" game. Otherwise we will have to report your actions as abuse - and yes, we will have a notable support for such statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vorov2 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you need more you can search for more. And my point is :
--nCdy (talk) 12:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC) This user has made few or no other edits outside this topic.--rgpk (comment) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
--nCdy (talk) 9 February 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 08:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Scientific (non-RSDN) articles which bases at Nemerle, or uses it/researches arround it, or have a references to it:
Some significant projects, written in Nemerle.
--Kochetkov.vladimir (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as insufficient evidence of notability has been shown. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure programming language. I can't find any reliable sources. Additionally, this page has had the notability tag for almost a year. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Nominator was indefintely blocked as the sockpupet of Crouch, Swale (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Armbrust Talk Contribs 21:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No pages link to it Toolsavoid e (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no reliable third-party publications Toolsavoid e (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. A7 Ronhjones (Talk) 23:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable Toolsavoid e (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was There's a real Danica Jurčová and she's a notable Slovak actress but this piece of garbage was so filthy it shouldn't even be in the edit history. I've deleted the article, with no prejudice against a real article being created. DS (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable Toolsavoid e (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No sources demonstrate notability for either her or her work Yaksar (let's chat) 20:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see 1969 book reviews in the Chicago Tribune and the Hartford Courant. Cullen328 (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable book. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, reason was: We don't generally carry articles about youth or reserve teams - maybe some mention in the first team article at Sunderland A.F.C. would be OK, but I don't think WP:NSPORTS supports a separate article -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete -- most of the keep votes below either attack the nominator or refer to sourcing that's actually for a different language/environment. It appears that there is not sufficient reliable sourcing to maintain an article on this topic.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure programming language. I can't find any notable sources. Language has had the "notability" tag for over a year. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 18:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet notability guidelines for musicians, and very likely an autobiography by User:Unisolit, too. bender235 (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any notability. bender235 (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just a duplicate of information at the far more complete Major League Baseball single-season home run record. Staxringold talkcontribs 17:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HSBC Sri Lanka
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Effectively First Lady of Libya, but has only a very few passing mentions in the media. This is probably a test of WP:NOTINHERITED, which appears to imply that a First Lady is notable in her own right. The only real information I've been able to find is this, an witness statement by Saif al-Islam Muammar Al-Gaddafi (her son), which if it is accurate would somewhat disagree with a description of her as a first lady ("She is not a public figure in her own right, and she is nothing like a First Lady", para 4). ninety:one 16:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per G12 - blatant copyright violation SmartSE (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NOT for the many and various reasons to flush this ESSAY WuhWuzDat 14:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per G12 - blatant copyright violation SmartSE (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Individual of questionable notability. From a google search she appears to be more notable for being a contestant in a cooking show than being on the radio. The only evidence provided for her notability in the article is for a book she has written, and I cannot find this book in any reliable booklists. Article has been tagged as an orphan since its creation in December 2010. roleplayer 14:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No need for a page for a bands minor radio, TV, and internet appearances, any relevant info should be split into more appropriate articles Yaksar (let's chat) 14:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No need for a page for a bands minor radio, TV, and internet appearances, any relevant info should be split into more appropriate articles Yaksar (let's chat) 14:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity article that totally fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG standards. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 13:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to meet WP:Notability requirements. Can find no sign of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Qwfp (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable vehicle; prod removed by author. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 13:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable footballer who fails WP:NSPORTS. Initial prod was contested because he has played in European competition, but as far as I can tell these are only qualification matches, which are generally regarded as not notable. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Little info here, just not notable enough. Previously deleted at AfD. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 11:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 13:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I find no evidence of Kulisek being on permanent display in the Orsay (via their own published catalogue, see [18]), no matches in GBooks or GNews and the only relevant matches in Google appear circular. The article fails WP:V and fails to make a verifiable case against WP:ARTIST. The article was PRODded in 2009 and it was rejected on the basis that sources might be found, however considering the continuing lack of sources it seems unlikely that this will be addressed in the near future. Fæ (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 13:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG & WP:ENTERTAINER. The article contains no reliable source which establishes notability. Some of the sources on the article are from unreliable & questionable sources (websites operated by one person, such as nigeriafilms.com, modernghana.com, timbuktumedia.com) which do not have a reputation of fact checking as stipulated by WP:RS. Amsaim (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a European environmental organization of which notability has not been established. Its name gives many hits in google (which I didn't check all), but do no give immediately to reliable sources for the organization, addition of search terms like "Noah's ark" (1 of their projects) only gives facebook etc and their own website. Also their own website (www.europeanwildlife.org) has no items/links from reliable sources. I (and several other editors) engaged in discussion with the original author 2 months ago and pointed out the sources should be provided, but that also was unsuccessful. L.tak (talk) 09:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N Can't find reliable, secondary sources to establish the notability of this manga artist. (Actually, I didn't see anything reliable enough to even verify it, although I suspect someone could run the credits.) Only pushed to AfD rather than PROD because sourcing through the Japanese language barrier is tricky. j⚛e deckertalk to me 08:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. The burden of proof of coughing up reliable sources falls on the "keep" side. But the burden for rejecting them falls on the "delete" side, and they have not sufficiently shown the article to be a hoax. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable artist; I cannot find any significant coverage on him other than primary sources. (He is not to be confused with the DJ of the same name.) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (copied from talk page) I've integrated the four citations I found into the article, and since they appear to be of good quality I've removed both the OR and CITE tags. I also expanded the timeline section based on the timeline provided in the Inano citation. (this is a pretty close paraphrase in places so may need further rewording).
There is still the question of whether all this is a hoax, as tagged by the article creator? I don't beleive it qualifies as a wikipedia hoax, as the info is clearly cited in reliable sources. The broader question is whether those sources have been the victim of a wide ranging and elaborate hoax? This is very hard to ascertain, unless the article author has reason to beleive otherwise, as was suggested by their edit summary when they put up the hoax tag. It has to be noted that if this is all genuine, Dr Lam is a pretty incredible person, having excelled in art, science, medicine and business! I believe that as it stands, the article should stay as it appears to have reliable sources, I can see no direct evidence of a hoax and if the sources are correct the individual is very clearly notable. This should be reviewed in the light of any future information that comes to light. Note, all of this talk of a hoax is pure speculation, based on the article authors comment. I am concerned that discussing such a hoax may itself become a WP:BLP issue if we are not careful.
I think I might kick this to a wider audience for review, as it's clearly an odd case and I am concerned about potential BLP issues here.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very minor God in the Canaanite Pantheon. Listed already at Canaanite religion#Pantheon, and best left there. Contested PROD. Leave as redirect to Canaanite religion#Pantheon. (Note, I added the info to Canaanite religion after PROD was contested, otherwise would have been a CSD A10). Ravendrop (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Article was already WP:BOLDly redirected to Abel Sánchez. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find anything on this person that isn't promotion from his radio station. Fails WP:BIO notability criteria. Fbifriday (talk) 06:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've redirected this article to Abel Sánchez, an article I've just created on the famous novel by Miguel de Unamuno. I notice that there's a few erronious links to this article. Raul654 (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
person of extremely questionable notability WuhWuzDat 06:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CSD declined by non-admin. 0 G-hits, nothing on google news. Even adding team names of anywhere he supposedly played comes up with nothing. I can find absolutely nothing on this person anywhere. I believe they fail the GNG, but most certainly fails WP:PEOPLE and WP:ATH Fbifriday (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1. This page appears to have been created purely to attack the subject
2. The subject himself does not appear to have sufficient notability to justify an article Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My reasons for the article being kept are contained on the talk page. I stand by those reasons. Apollo1986 (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore, I propose to delete the deletion tag and restore the article to how it as before. Please let me know if you disagree with my conclusion that this is in accordance with policy and if so on what grounds. Apollo1986 (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable compilation. Fails WP:NALBUMS. Basically a reissue minus two tracks, nothing in Allmusic or anywhere else. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 06:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Howling Bells discography. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability requirements per Wikipedia:MUSIC Yaksar (let's chat) 05:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Howling Bells discography. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability requirements per Wikipedia:MUSIC Yaksar (let's chat) 05:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Howling Bells discography. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability requirements per Wikipedia:MUSIC Yaksar (let's chat) 05:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Professor that does not give any evidence of notability Yaksar (let's chat) 05:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
President of a college that seems to be a very minor institution, does not meet criteria for notablity Yaksar (let's chat) 05:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced BLP, apparent autobio; can't tell if it's a total masturbatory fantasy or merely poorly written self-promotion. Orange Mike | Talk 05:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:ENTERTAINER, and all of the comments addressed at the previous AfD (which resulted in delete) still apply in this case Yaksar (let's chat) 05:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Completely in-universe article about a character that, though important to the series, barely appears in it. Very few, if any, outside sources due to the character's scarcity. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 05:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Spam by employee of nexTier Networks, possibly Mustafa himself, about non-notable software figure. Orange Mike | Talk 05:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have been created by an employee of Next Tier Networks to advertise their "solution". My first impulse is simply to delete it as obvious spam, but I don't want to be overhasty if there's anything salvageable. Orange Mike | Talk 05:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article was prodded with a rationale of "huh". While I understand why Ron Ritzman chose to decline the prod, I hardly see why this is a notable concept—it seems to just be a summary of a single graduate student's world view. NW (Talk) 03:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While there are a few hits on the internets for this subject, I'm going to propose he's not notable enough for inclusion here. The article is a BLP nightmare (check the history, and see where I removed false accusations and unverified claims to fame), and I just don't think Dan-E and whatever else he's responsible for is that notable. Drmies (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: consensus for keep. Persistent coverage after the event [25], per wp:blp1e. Non-admin closure. walk victor falk talk 01:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jeffrey Maier is not really anymore notable than anyone else who interferes with a ball. The story is an interesting one and appropriately belongs in articles about that playoff series and perhaps articles about MLB Instant Reply Lrusso99 (talk) 02:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unelected, non-notable local politician. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This articles violates various Wikipedia policies - i.e. original research, WP:SYNTH, WP:NOTESSAY,.. This article looks like a doctorate thesis to me and not like an encyclopedic article. The subject of the article is already discussed in length in a multitude of other articles like effects of cannabis and long-term effects of cannabis. Spatulli (talk) 21:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Useless article, it lists only the dates and names of the tours and each of them doesn't even have an article. Wikipedia is not a fan site, so I request this article to be deleted. OttoBR (talk) 22:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been WP:PRODed twice and yet it still violates WP:RS, WP:BAND, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:BLP and WP:SPS. It has survived with a misused ((newpage)) template which has kept us at bay for a while. Note that the primary editor has been warned about the need for improvement of the article on his/her talk page and the article talk page.TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello everyone. I am the editor and contributor for the page Jose E. Sanchez and I apologize for not complying quicker. I was unaware that this page existed, thus not responding sooner. I understand my page was not notable, but as I have stated before, it is still pending third-party resources that have been requested from outside sources months ago. My Blue Man Group band audition may not be notable, but my hour-long performance at Warped Tour (national tour), and legit state championships should be considered. The IMA is a major competition in Illinois where the state's best musicians perform pieces and judged by a panel. I do not have online resources because the IMA did not have a website until just recently, but I have hard copies of documents that I can scan if needed. No one seems to want to positively guide me to bring this page "up to bar" and I believe TonyTheTiger is harrassing me by giving me "hours" to prove myself. I believe that conduct is means for report and I won't hesistate to do so. I am not here to make enemies. I have stated before that I want to contribute as best as I can, but like I said, no assistance from anyone. Please do not get me wrong and insist I am just spamming, because I am not. Jose Sanchez 17:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC) User:EXI — Preceding unsigned comment added by EXIx2 (talk • contribs)
The result was delete. No sources. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Original research, only primary sources. Kenan does not appear by name in the Qu'ran, and, apparently, there are no secondary source saying that the son in that passage is called "Kenan". For context, see WP:ANI#Seeking_3_month_topic_ban_for_User:Imadjafar. Enric Naval (talk) 17:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge and redirect with a new article called Canaan (grandson of Noah). i.e. include mention of this Quranic transliteration of Canaan's name which appears to be "Kenan". Also, he isn't the son of Noah. He is the grandson of Noah. Noah's son Ham had a son called Canaan. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 04:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Ex post facto law. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a dictionary definition. It is an orphan, cites no other sources, and the current content of the page is about as much as can be said about the topic. Thus, I see no rationale for keeping this page. Nat682 (talk) 01:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With greatest respect, Mr Khairul Khalil appears to be a relative, but possibly not part of the royal family, of His Majesty, Hassanal Bolkiah, current Sultan of Brunei. Notability is not inherited. In the alternative, this article fails the test for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mexican singer of minimal note - as yet not wikipedia notable -perhaps redirect to a notable band she has been in or to a hit record she has had. Off2riorob (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article falls short of WP:ATHLETE and WP:BIO standards. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 05:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to House of Anubis#Main Cast. Redirecting on the suggestion from MQS. However, with one "keep" vote this falls just a little short of a consensus so consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unreffed (IMBD does not count), unencyclopedic, prob. not notable Edgar Vekilnik, Jr. (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non Notable Company (notability is attempted in article so it fails CSD). One outer source, however the rest aren't reliable. Dusti*poke* 04:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure programming language; can't find any sources. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FAILS WP:ORG. Non notable publishing house.Wiki is not for advertising.
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Associate editor in chief for an IEEE journal, professor. Impressive, but I don't think it quite establishes notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DeVerm's !vote is just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Cullen328's !vote has been refuted enough for a slight consensus to delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable product, reads very close to advertising. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 11:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Breaking the Habit. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Undiscussed split that goes against all precedent in articles about music singles. The video for a song essentially never receives a stand-alone article, basically under the consensus that it is undue weight to one aspect of the single. The only exception to that I can find is Michael Jackson's Thriller, and I don't think this even begins to approach the level of independent notoriety that that video has. My efforts to redirect this article back to Breaking the Habit#Music video were reverted, so here we are at AFD. Since the material in the main article is quite sufficient, this extraneous article should be deleted and a redirect installed in its place. —Kww(talk) 14:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTNEWS. Yes it has coverage in the news. However short-term coverage does not prove or imply long-term notability.
WP:EVENT states that "An event that is a precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance is likely to be notable." This is unfortunately the umpteenth bombing in Pakistan in the last couple of years and this particular bombing has nothing that makes it more notable than the many others.
To further quote from WP:EVENT "Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle." This particular bombing is very unlikely to receive any attention once something new comes along.
Simply put: While the attack should be noted on a list of events of the year or a list of all terrorist attacks of the year, it is simply not notable enough on its own. Travelbird (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is a company with 18 employees that won some awards. So what! Ok, it may meet WP:COMPANY but that just means that our notability guideline is set too low. If we let this one remain we will get all sorts of otherstuffexisting and WP will turn into a business directory rather than an encyclopaedia!. Delete it and change WP:COMPANY to prevent every CEO and market department setting up an article about their company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears not to pass WP:NOTABILITY for WP:BIO. Non-notable fashion designer is not made up for by being the daughter of a notable person, the later of which seems the only reason for inclusion Trident13 (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Mining industry of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. WP:UNDUE emphasis on the Canadian aspect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My initial prod was disputed, so I'm bringing this to full AFD instead. The core issue here is that fundamentally, this isn't so much an encyclopedia article as it is an exercise in public service journalism; the article's creator readily admitted on my talk page that they created it in response to an online debate about whether the Canadian business community should or shouldn't divest itself of natural resources investments in the Congo. What the article fails to do, however, is to demonstrate that "Canadian mining companies operating in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" actually constitutes a uniquely encyclopedic class of thing that's identifiably distinct from what other countries' mining companies are or aren't doing there; instead, the point seems to be to collate original research into a journalistic source that can inform and contribute to an active political debate in Canada. Which, admittedly, is a valuable project to take on — but given that we're an encyclopedia, not a public journalism hub, Wikipedia isn't really the place for it. I still believe it's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NTENNIS (has tennis records but they, being at NCAA Division 3 level, fail WP:Notability) Mayumashu (talk) 00:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NTENNIS Mayumashu (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable tv show. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]