The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xiamen Airlines Flight MF8667[edit]

Xiamen Airlines Flight MF8667 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Not fatal incident where plane skids off runway are common. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DELETE - WP:NOTNEWS Acnetj (talk) 20:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Runway excursions are not that common, and in this case the plane suffered serious damage - an engine ripped off - as well as closing down the main runway in the airport for 36 hours.[1][2] Coverage is fairly wide for this recent event, so WP:RAPID is in play (and supports retaining the article). Seems to meet the WP:AIRCRASH essay in that this is serious damage to the aircraft. Also, per [3], it seems quite likely this will cause changes in Manila's airport which would meet a second bullet in AIRCRASH - The accident or incident resulted in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports,....Icewhiz (talk) 11:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – A user has moved the article to Xiamen Airlines Flight 8667. – Wdchk (talk) 16:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Very close call; the plane might end up as a hull loss. News coverage is widespread. The only difference between this one and the recent Aeromexico takeoff crash in Durango, is that this one did not catch fire. Just the luck of the draw; passengers were in great danger with that type of damage to the plane.EditorASC (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per above comment, the incident also resulted in further discussions to improve NAIA by adding new runways or improving existing ones, or build a new airport outside Metro Manila to decongest or replace NAIA.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 01:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.