The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yakshagana makeup

[edit]

All of the information in here seems to be covered in the Yakshagana article. More to the point, the article doesn't even have a link from the main Yakshagana article, making its usefulness quite minimal. In all likelihood, it can be deleted with virtually no loss of content. Tyrenon (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. Non encyclopedic fork of exisitng article. Main article has the same section.--Deepak D'Souza 19:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there's any extra content merge, but don't redirect. It's an extremely unlikely search string. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.