The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; moved to draft per user request, but this should not be restored to mainspace without going through the proper AfC process. BD2412 T 04:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yann Blake[edit]

Yann Blake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill PR pieces, nothing that makes him pass GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree every article has to be challenged. I do think with PR pieces from 2017 to 2020 and the relation to the film industry, it makes the article relevant and legitimate. I am happy to hear the opinion of other Wikipedia editors. --ClémentContrib (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.