The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 19:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeshe Jinpa

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is autobiographical, non-neutral, presents utterly unverifiable original research that reads as a bad advertisement for a non-notable self-styled guru, than as a relevant article. Aizen4515 (talk) 04:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 02:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Autobiographical and self promotional. No indication of notability. Safiel (talk) 04:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.