The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tottenham Hotspur F.C.#Support. Although I recognize calls to merege, there's nothing sourced to merge. Delete and redirect is clear policy-based consensus (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yid Army[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Yid_Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-encyclopedic and unsourced (and where sources are given they do not support the text) MrStoofer (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. The article is factually wrong that "Yid Army" is the name of a group of hooligans. It is a name that Spurs supporters call themselves.

2. The source given for the claim that "The Yids is the name of a football hooligan firm associated with English football club Tottenham Hotspur" (here) says no such thing. It does refer to supporters of Tottenham Hotspur as "Yid Army" (not "Yids") and more importantly does not support the claim that the term refers to hooligans rather than supporters generally.

3. All the rest of the claims on the page are unsourced and unsupported (e.g. the claim of membership of 250+ or the claims about enthinicity).

I strongly suspect that this is page was simply self aggrandizement. MrStoofer (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MrStoofer (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I didn't think about the name as a search term, but that makes sense to redirect per Mentoz suggestion. Govvy (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Poorly written - but references are available here and here. --Egghead06 (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also agree that after deletion, the page should redirect to Tottenham Hotspur F.C.#Support as a likely search term MrStoofer (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.