The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:55, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yin Zhiqun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm sorry, but where's the notability? Delete. --Nlu (talk) 02:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This looks almost like a case for A7 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Since the current version of the article is probably a candidate for CSD A7, I tried to verify some of the statements made in an older version, to no avail. I found this, but the coverage is not significant; also this and this, but they are blogs. I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. By the way, the article looks to have been copy-and-pasted. Not sure what action to take, so I tagged it. Braincricket (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.