The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yone Minagawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability besides this person's reaching an advanced age. Her entries on the List of the verified oldest women and List of Japanese supercentenarians are sufficient. — JFG talk 16:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, any world's oldest person should always be guaranteed an article. LE (talk) 17:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is no policy or guideline that the "oldest x" is notable or entitled to an article. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.