The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yu Hwang-Wu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications that this article meets the criteria for inclusion. Cited references are all self-published press releases or blogs on CNN's "I-Report" service, a self-publishing initiative. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sources are too feeble. No general notability, certainly no academic notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Reluctant delete. I suspect that there may exist enough reliable sources in Korean to pass WP:GNG. This one, for instance, looks like it might be ok, though there is not much in it about him personally. But too many of the hits on Google news archive (for either the Latin or Hangul spellings of his name) appear to be either press releases or malware sites, and Google translate doesn't produce very readable text from Korean, so I can't be sure. And in its current state, with only primary sources, there is no reason to keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.