The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yujuan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be particularly notable, is fairly promotional, and has a single reference to some sort of amazonesque site. This is the 4th pretty much indentical creation of this article by the same user, it has already been speedied twice and prodded Jac16888 ^Talk 03:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~Keep After a quick search in Chinese, there's a lot of RS to establish her notability(e.g. people.com has a full report about her here [1], also see this news search result[2]), albeit in Chinese. And after an English search, I can't seem to find any RS. ~~I am not familiar with our policies on this kind of situation so I'm not going to take a position on this. (Though I guess it's probably a Delete) Zlqchn (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)~~ Scratch that, per WP:GNG, sources in other languages are OK as long as they are reliable, independent, etc...Zlqchn (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Cloveapple (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reliable sources have been found giving significant coverage. Dream Focus 08:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 21:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Yu Juan. She is called a famous breast cancer awareness campaigner in the news[3][4].--Skyfiler (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. —Ed!^(talk) 20:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've searched for the book under its Chinese title and have been able to add two more sources (one primary) that show the book was reviewed by the China Daily and the People's Daily which are major Chinese newspapers. It was also reviewed in several regional papers. Pol430 talk to me 22:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.