The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Stet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete for WP:NN. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The comments enclosed are from accounts confirmed to have engaged in sockpuppetry. Mike V • Talk 04:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Artist meets WP:MUS and WP:NN from being apart of a notable national Tour(Hosted by BET Networks, Viacom). Also received and is still receiving heavy radio spins from notable radio networks and Music Video networks. Content rotation including SiriusXM Radio,MTV and many other notable networks. Also, I noticed the artists already have registered lyrics and has worked with many notable musicians, linked to the page. Sec12345 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment - BlackJack58 (talk · contribs) attempted to close this discussion as speedy keep, but I've reverted for obvious reasons. Let the discussion continue. ansh 666 11:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment - Dear Users please lets wait until a clear consensus is reach before closing a discussion whether you favor or disapprove. Also, try to leave the closing to more experienced users and not the obvious less experienced. Thanks for your participation, also wiki has advice/help articles, for new and less experienced users to help make better decisions. Topdog2014 (talk) 18:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Keep: With capability of being Strong keep. Included sources in article shows requirement for notable musician. Meets more than one requirement. Was able to find additional reputable sources as well including major broadcastings. Also I noticed this article has been updated and have good faith edits from other editors. Chosenone Pie (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] Keep I will say this meet the notability requirement. Don't really see any major issues. Cec2020 (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The comments enclosed are from accounts confirmed to have engaged in sockpuppetry. Mike V • Talk 04:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Artist meets WP:MUS and WP:NN from being apart of a notable national Tour(Hosted by BET Networks, Viacom). Also received and is still receiving heavy radio spins from notable radio networks and Music Video networks. Content rotation including SiriusXM Radio,MTV and many other notable networks. Also, I noticed the artists already have registered lyrics and has worked with many notable musicians, linked to the page. Sec12345 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - BlackJack58 (talk · contribs) attempted to close this discussion as speedy keep, but I've reverted for obvious reasons. Let the discussion continue. ansh 666 11:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Dear Users please lets wait until a clear consensus is reach before closing a discussion whether you favor or disapprove. Also, try to leave the closing to more experienced users and not the obvious less experienced. Thanks for your participation, also wiki has advice/help articles, for new and less experienced users to help make better decisions. Topdog2014 (talk) 18:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: With capability of being Strong keep. Included sources in article shows requirement for notable musician. Meets more than one requirement. Was able to find additional reputable sources as well including major broadcastings. Also I noticed this article has been updated and have good faith edits from other editors. Chosenone Pie (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I will say this meet the notability requirement. Don't really see any major issues. Cec2020 (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete non-notable, meets none of the criteria of WP:NMUSIC, falls far short of general notability. Possibly a paid editing job, certainly a strong COI as the editor creating the article went out of their way to avoid scrutiny, creating at least half a dozen sock puppet accounts.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 05:08, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 07:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:NMUSIC. Rampant sock puppetry is an indication of conflict of interest knowing this article fails notability. LibStar (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.