The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:TOOSOON. No prejustice against recreation when she becomes notable. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Nightingale (Volleyball)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a college volleyball player who does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion of articles about athletes. Nightingale has not (yet) achieved any of these, so is not notable. Sparthorse (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Totally non-notable. Emeraude (talk) 13:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's early days yet for this young woman, however, and so the usual caveats do apply. Notability isn't there yet - but may be down the line. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Until she makes a notable achievement, she does not need an article. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 15:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.