The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

iTalkBB[edit]

Non notable. Most of the content promotes the company (the criticism section, though providing some neutrality, does not add to the companies notability) Ernestvoice (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources to establish the notability of the company, plus the criticisms section appears largely unsourced. —C.Fred (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Voidvector (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Voidvector (talk) 16:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJ^Talk 19:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Sean Whitton / 14:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per C.Fred. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.