The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Bgwhite (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 22:59, Wednesday June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Pywikipedia and a python script

Function overview: Ensure that section headings are properly nested.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Snotbot 5 and User talk:Scottywong/Archive 22#I need some snot

Edit period(s): Weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: ~1,300 month

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Scottywong is heading into retirement and would like to hand off some of his bot's functions. This request handles Snotbot's BRFA 5. The bot will fix section heading that are not nested sequentially. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (accessibility)#Headings, "Headings should be nested sequentially, starting with level 2 (==), then level 3 (===) and so on...". Bgwhite (talk) 22:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to get approval for the same task too. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 18:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Here are the edits. Two different scripts were used. The difference between the two is one script gets its data from the Checkwiki database via here and the other script gets its data from a database dump. I forgot to change the edit on the last 9 edits as it used the different script from the first 41. Bgwhite (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

((tl:BAG assistance needed))  Approved. All looks good, trusted.·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.