The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Emaus (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 03:06, Tuesday December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python (pywikipedia framework)

Source code available: Yes

Function overview: Resolve double redirects

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): ~ 1 time per day

Estimated number of pages affected: 100 - 1000 per day

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes

Function details: Resolve double redirects using the standard script redirect.py

Discussion[edit]

If you don't think there are enough bots doing this already. Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 21:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Has this trial been done? Mr.Z-man 04:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course. Since I didn't see the number of trial edits, I decide to make them for two weeks. Edits can be found here: [1], [2], [3], [4], etc by comment "Bot: Fixing double redirect". --Emaus (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. Seems fine. Standard redirect.py. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.