The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Denied.

Operator: OsamaK

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB for making a list. Pywikipedia for tagging and telling the uploader, by Betacommand

Function Summary: Find the images without source and telling the uploader

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: This bot finds some words if it's there skip, if not, add tag and tell the uploader. I do a test. I thinks it was good!

this is not what I wrote. β^_command 18:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

now it's yours ;)--((subst:#ifeq:((subst:NAMESPACE))|User talk|((subst:#ifeq:((subst:PAGENAME))|OsamaK|OsamaK|OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please}))|OsamaK)) 18:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "by Betacommand". If you are using pywikipedia, it would help if you provided the script name (xxx.py). Cbrown1023 talk 22:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it's special python script working with pywikipedia by Betacommand.--((subst:#ifeq:((subst:NAMESPACE))|User talk|((subst:#ifeq:((subst:PAGENAME))|OsamaK|OsamaK|OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please}))|OsamaK)) 07:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the script that I wrote for Os

amaK should NOT be considered a bot, what it does is takes a list of images that have been check by a human, and either tags them all as nrd or nsd and notifies the uploaders. β^_command 02:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Betacommand. I'm not sure what's the difference. Any way I'll make my script using C# in a few weeks. If god will. Thanks Betacommand.--((subst:#ifeq:((subst:NAMESPACE))|User talk|((subst:#ifeq:((subst:PAGENAME))|OsamaK|OsamaK|OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please}))|OsamaK)) 13:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I'll mark this request as ((BotWithdrawn)). Feel free to reopen it at any time when you've created the script. —METS501 (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Mets501, Now I'll run it with Betacommand's script, it works well! --((subst:#ifeq:((subst:NAMESPACE))|User talk|((subst:#ifeq:((subst:PAGENAME))|OsamaK|OsamaK|OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please}))|OsamaK)) 11:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work with this script for some week, then I'll make a new BRFA for mine.--((subst:#ifeq:((subst:NAMESPACE))|User talk|((subst:#ifeq:((subst:PAGENAME))|OsamaK|OsamaK|OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please}))|OsamaK)) 11:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —METS501 (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol, I have done it. Thanks!--OsamaK 19:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot blocked for continuing over the 50 edit test (Osama continued to run it at high speed up into the thousands, with a lot of negative feedback, until the bot was blocked). Neil ム 22:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neil, Please Don't block bot who doesn't work at the time of blocking, and please disable AutoBlock when you block any another bot. Thanks.--OsamaK 19:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So why did you run it for thousands of edits, rather than the 50 it was approved for? Neil ム 07:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right!, it was a wrong ,but you should not block my bot. message at my user talk was enough. No problem, now I wait some BAG's members :)--OsamaK 19:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! no one to see my bot's test?--OsamaK 04:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. per my understanding of this bot through my conversation with the operator. This bot task requires human review, and OsamaK is not providing it. This tagging, which OsamaK could not accurately explain to me, is erroneous as there is sufficient information present to determine the copyright holder - it's the company which the logo signifies. Further, I do not believe OsamaK would be a competent operator for this task even if all edits were reviewed, per his understanding of policy and communication skills during our conversation. --ST47Talk·Desk 12:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.