The result of the debate was Delete K1Bond007 17:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
CFD notice was put up without a listing, so I'm adding it now (it's not my nomination). I'd delete because it's not likely to get used (and has a slash). SeventyThree(Talk) 22:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was No consensus to delete K1Bond007 05:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If Category:Controversial books is getting whacked, then so should this one (but please gather and preserve the information of the list before ripping out the attributes from all of the article pages). My reasoning is techincal: This kind of thing should be a list only. Why? It is because the grouping (what is on or off such a list) is hard to manage. Trying to do it with a category (with over 100 books) means you fight the fight of "what is on and off the list" on 100 articles. This should be one "List of" article and that it is. Balance issues, etc. can be worked out there. Again: category is just a bad way to do it: you visit the book's page, you see that attribute and it is distracing and possibly prejudicial (to read the book or not, depending on the reader of the article). -- Fplay 22:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was No consensus K1Bond007 05:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They're redudnant, and there's no reason to decide between one or the other. I think "Industries" is the one that should remain, since it fits the pluralization pattern and does indicate we'll end up with a list of all industries in a category. Mikeblas 22:29, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete - Izehar 09:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Soltak | Talk 22:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep K1Bond007 17:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep K1Bond007 17:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Merge and Delete K1Bond007 17:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep K1Bond007 18:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was No consensus K1Bond007 05:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Category:NowCommons. Same thing, different template, very confusing name. -- Beland 11:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename K1Bond007 06:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete - Izehar 14:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Disney direct-to-video films
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:People from Buffalo, New York K1Bond007 05:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On December 13, a category was nominated for deletion due to a typo. The discussion was closed as delete for that specific category, however, there were some votes/comments to rename the category as well. I'm merely relisting this for debate. K1Bond007 01:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]