The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:30, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Deprecated - template is now redirected to more inclusive Category:Industry stubs. Grutness...wha? 21:52, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 13:36, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Why is there a category of unrelated people who share a surname? How can this possibly be useful to anyone? --Polynova 17:58, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:38, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
It has been pointed out to me that this category is redundant, and also that it is an area too poorly defined to be properly categorised. As its creator, can I ask for a speedy delete on a category? Hiding 17:20, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:40, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Entire catagory...for two people. I'd imagine the user confused this with a disambig (though he seems to have been to the disambig in question) --InShaneee 17:13, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. It's just a misplaced disambig if you ask me. --Hoovernj 21:13, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Airports of Yukon --Kbdank71 13:43, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Renamed to Category:Airports of the Yukon to be consistent. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 11:19, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:29, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Duplicate of Category:Central business districts , nothing inside it. SimonLyall 10:03, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep --Kbdank71 13:47, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Pejorative and POV title. At the very least, this category should be renamed. Personally, though, I think we should delete it. This category is a haphazard mix of articles on topics ranging from creationism to alternative medicine to divination. I honestly don't think these articles need to be categorized to gether. They all belong to appropriate category structures already. Is there any reason we need to have Feng Shui and numerology in the same category? --Azkar 00:35, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]