The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I'm mistaken, I believe prior discussions concluded that we shouldn't categorise films by actor. Extraordinary Machine 23:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The battleship class has been changed to Tegetthoff. The original items of this category were migrated into newly created Category:Tegetthoff class battleships. Sandius 21:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. the wub "?!" 22:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Category:Washington state highways. Got mired in some silly process arguments so has to come here again. In the U.S. state of Washington, a state highway is a road maintained by the state. This includes Interstates and U.S. Routes. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 21:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename the wub "?!" 22:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename. This category should simply be changed to matched the main article, Queen's University of Belfast.--67.70.161.113 20:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
for Paragons of virtue; needs objective inclusion criteria -- ProveIt (talk) 18:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See: Category:Cleveland Indians (NFL) players ProveIt (talk) 18:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus therefore keep. the wub "?!" 22:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Previous rename debate[reply]
The result of the debate was rename all. the wub "?!" 22:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abbreviations should be avoided unless the full name is ridiculously long or less clear than the abbreviation. CalJW 17:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 22:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While the word "accounting" is a commonly used verb it sounds odd as the name of the subject area category. The main article is Accountancy. CalJW 17:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was merge with Category:Accountancy. the wub "?!" 22:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Miscellaneous" categories are just a bad idea. Articles should be put in more accurate categories where possible, but where that is not yet or will never be appropriate they should be left in the general category. CalJW 17:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 22:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only national media category name out of 110 which included the word "mass". The everyday meaning of media is clear and requires no qualifier. Rename CalJW 17:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 22:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Already deleted. - TexasAndroid 17:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:Ramsar sites in Pakistan Siddiqui Siddiqui 15:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge to Category:The West Wing (TV series). the wub "?!" 22:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:The West Wing (TV series) ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge both Category:Rome (television) Characters and Category:Rome characters to Category:Rome (TV series) characters. the wub "?!" 22:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:Rome characters ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by User:David Kernow ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:Professional wrestling venues ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by its creator ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Already deleted. - TexasAndroid 17:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:Rosenborg B.K. players ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Already deleted. - TexasAndroid 13:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redundant to Category:Railway stations in East Renfrewshire ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Already deleted. - TexasAndroid 17:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by creator ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
inexplicable ProveIt (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 22:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to clarify. For the same reasons that we just renamed the pre-Union English MPs and Scottish MPs categories. Mais oui! 13:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 22:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization fix. Kirill Lokshin 01:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 22:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to have been created specifically for two people (its sole inhabitants at the moment), but the term "Canadian Briton" is a neologism (indeed, "Briton" is used only for the ancient inhabitants of the British Islaes and by newspapers who need to conserve space; it's not standard English for British people. It's not entirely clear what it means: Canadian-born British citizens? Canadians living in Britain? It at least needs renaming (though I don't know what to); my preference is for deletion. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Murderers of children. the wub "?!" 22:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting change to a more legally sounding and less emotive description. -- Longhair 05:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge into Category:Foreigners in China. the wub "?!" 22:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete. too POV and unnecessary - there s already Category:Foreigners in China who by definition are residents, not citizens (or they could not be described as 'foreigners') Mayumashu 04:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete TexasAndroid 20:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category contains no articles and appears to be intended for advertising purposes. Delete. --Metropolitan90 03:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]