< January 19 | January 21 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 03:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category is point of view. I don't see similar categories for other countries. Please delete. ReeseM 22:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 03:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another misguided England category, unfortunately missed when several were nominated and deleted before. England has five sixths of the UK population and in the overwhelming majority of areas of life there are UK wide structures, not England-only ones. It contained firstly "transport in England", which ran to about 10 words, not counting headings, after three a half months so I have converted it into a redirect, and secondly the bridges category, which has other categories. There is no English transport system, no ministry, no regulatory bodies, no professional bodies, no road system, no rail system, no aviation system, no England wide but not UK wide operators etc etc etc. There is a British transport system, which is covered exhaustively in Category:Transport in the United Kingdom. On the one hand this is a pointless intermediate step, on the other is is worse than that because it is misleading to have a category which suggest that there is a specifically English transport system. Delete CalJW 21:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 03:01, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a not very famous league so it should be spelled out in full. Golfcam 19:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 03:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I started this cat, but made another per naming conventions, Category:Orders of columns, and emptied this one.--Bkwillwm 16:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename all. Syrthiss 03:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Consistency with others in its parent category, Category:Wikipedia templates. Would be okay instead to rename it to Category:Wikipedia:Navigational templates, but I think just Category:Navigational templates would be more consistent. —Markles 12:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category should be re-named in line with the other Politician categories. The stub category is oddly named as well, so I've listed that at WP:WSS. Valentinian 08:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 02:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Empty category left over from before the VfD->AfD rename. I could speedy, but I'm new to CFD, so I thought I'd take it the slow-and-steady way, just to be sure. ^demon 05:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another abbreviation which should be expanded to improve clarity and presentation. Rename Choalbaton 05:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus, again.. Syrthiss 02:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category cannot be made NPOV. It is naturally defined by the POV of the Roman Catholic Church. Delete entirely. SwissCelt 04:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Syrthiss 02:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We now have several dozen more specific, recently created categories under Category:Women's National Basketball Association players, Category:College basketball players, and so on. This conceivably could be a catchall for those, but if not, it should be deleted.--Mike Selinker 03:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Grutness...wha? 18:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other countries also have states. Rename. Choalbaton 03:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abbreviation to go. Choalbaton 02:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Much clearer. --Neutralitytalk 02:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We can hopefully improve things from both perspectives in this case. "Cinema" should be added clarity in line with parent category:Cinemas and movie theaters (and six out of eight of the national subcategories use cinema rather than movie theater). But on the other hand "Theater" should be spelled the American way. Rename Choalbaton 01:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was merge to Category:People shot dead by police and delete. Syrthiss 02:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
POV. --Ezeu 00:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 02:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Much better name and in line with proposals below. Vegaswikian 00:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]