The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 05:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was withdrawn Tim! 20:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only one article since creation in April, probably a bit too specific. Tim! 21:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete --William Allen Simpson 05:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category is too general, and too POV to be useful. While the Category:One-of-a-kind computers is useful (computers built only once), this category attempts to divide game consoles due innovation. As virtually every console brought an innovation, virtually every console would need to be added here. ReyBrujo 21:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was moved to AFD. - EurekaLott 22:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The page describes a commercial software product and was probably set up by the developer itself --> misplaced advertising Naui 20:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus to rename (but there is consensus for the category to exist). Conscious 06:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category's current name is too all encompassing and rather than allow for the subtleties that an article's text permits it just blanket labels anyone found in it as an "anti-Semite". While it's true that a given individual may express views on anti-Semitism, to blanket refer to them as an anti-Semite, particularly if there isn't a body of points of view that add up neutrally to the person being labeled as such allows for editors to add individuals based upon their own original research personal points of view. Netscott 20:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 05:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Match the standard naming convention for categories of events during a particular war. Kirill Lokshin 19:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete all --William Allen Simpson 05:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When a phrase is used as a modifier it should be hyphenated. Additionally, Wikipedians should be capitalized. Esprit15d 15:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 05:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
for consistency with category:BBC children's television programmes. (I haven't checked all the other tv companies for style though.--Shantavira 13:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete --William Allen Simpson 05:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not encyclopedic, and not noteworthy enough to be mentioned in the bio articles. The people listed are not particularly associated with Vespa, and this type of categorization encourages the proliferation of trivia. Also could be interpreted as product endorsement, although I doubt this was the intent. Rossrs 13:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete --William Allen Simpson 05:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is too specified to be useful. The fact that Forrest Gump played table tennis should be in his article Dakart 08:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 05:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We already have Category:Conflicts in Canada and Category:Military history of Canada dealing primarily with military conflicts in and out of Canada. by removing or changnig the instructions on the Category:Conflicts in Canada, the category could accept non-military confrontations between groups within Canada, along with military confrontations that perhaps are not considered wars. The Category:Aboriginal conflicts in Canada was created in an effort to keep Category:Conflicts in Canada to exclusively military subjects, making Category:Conflicts in Canada somewhat more redundant then it already was. Category:Aboriginal conflicts in Canada also is a small category with little potential for growth. Mike McGregor (Can) 02:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 05:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Freccia category contains nothing except its own page. Dakart 01:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]