< July 10 July 12 >

July 11

Category:Converts to Episcopalianism from Roman Catholicism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Converts to Episcopalianism from Roman Catholicism to Category:Converts to Anglicanism from Roman Catholicism
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There is no Category:Converts to Episcopalianism. "Episcopalianism" is a synonym for "Anglicanism" that is used in a few countries. No need to subdivide, especially at this point with only one article in it. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - while a few of the articles in the higher level category could be moved to this one, it is not big enough to need sub-categories by branch of the Anglican Churches in communion with Canterbury. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chief justices of Lithuania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Chief justices of Lithuania to Category:Presidents of the Constitutional Court of Lithuania
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The "chief justice" of Lithuania is the President of the Constitutional Court of Lithuania. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Support rename. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Red-Headed Women

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete under G4, see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 August 6#Category:Red-headed celebrities. — ξxplicit 20:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Red-Headed Women (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Not entirelys sure what purpose this category serves. Will just lead to arguements and edit warring more likely than not. magnius (talk) 20:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Semi-arid climate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Semi-arid climate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Category appears to have been created to hold one bio energy feedstock plant. Clearly that plant has noting to do with climate the sole parent. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Internal combustion engine vehicles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Internal combustion engine vehicles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. I fail to see the need to classify vehicles in this way. Especially since vehicles can use several different types of internal combustion engines. It would be better to cleanup, split or rename Category:Internal combustion engine to concentrate of the various types. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedian New York Mets fans

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedian New York Mets fans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: What relevance does this have to building an encyclopaedia? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fighting Records albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Fighting Records albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete: redlink label —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 16:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Faith & Hope albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Faith & Hope albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - redlink record label —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 16:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Prep school

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. If a disambiguation category is warranted, any editor is free to create it. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Prep school (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete as ill-defined (given the different meaning of the term in North-America and Europe). Moreover, redundant with Category:Preparatory schools and Category:Private schools which serves to distinguish the two. Pichpich (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional vegetarians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: history repeats itself, delete. The issue isn't necessarily verifiability, but whether being a vegetarian is a defining characteristic for these fictional characters: consensus has concluded that it is not. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Fictional vegetarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete as (for the overwhelming majority) a non-defining characteristic. There is already a list covering fictional vegetarians. Pichpich (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: Abolishthedarkness (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Microcomputers with non-standard form factors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Microcomputers with non-standard form factors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. The articles so categorized do not seem to mention this factor at all, and I can see precious little about this anywhere in Wikipedia. Seems to be WP:OC#SUBJECTIVE and non-defining. If more technically adept people than me come along and prove me wrong, and I'll be glad to be so proven, in this case. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scheduled elections in Canada

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename back to where it started. — ξxplicit 04:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Scheduled elections in Canada to Category:Future elections in Canada
Nominator's rationale: Rename. In Canada many provinces do not have fixed election dates and are called at the whim of the governing party, even federally for example the government has not followed its fixed election date law. The rename used to be the old name until someone changed it. Þadius (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am not opposed to it being renamed something like upcoming elections or expected elections or using some other word with an ambiguous future tense type meaning. I just think that scheduled isn't one size fits all. --Þadius (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.