< March 26 March 28 >

March 27

Category:Granville numbers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Granville numbers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Although possibly as rare as the perfect numbers, it's nowhere near as interesting a property. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What makes Granville numbers less interesting than perfect numbers?
It is true that there is far less scholarly work on Granville numbers than perfect numbers, but they were only defined in 1996 as opposed to perfect numbers which have been defined for over 3 millennia.
Also, even before I started editing the articles on numbers, other editor had mentioned them in Perfect number, 24 (number), 96 (number), and 126 (number), so I was just trying to tie them all together by putting them all in the same category. Mjpam (talk) 00:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A relevant guideline is WP:NUMBER#Notability of lists of numbers and categories:
"The creation of categories must not be taken lightly: one must be able to demonstrate that the category would be populated by a significant amount of articles on notable topics."
In this case, the only potentially notable topic would be Granville number, itself. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - we don't have categories for articles on numbers with a particular property (with a very small number of exceptions). The numbers in this sequence are listed in the Granville number article. Gandalf61 (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with the Shevchenko Scientific Society

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename and do a manual prune afterwards if some memberships are unknown. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:People associated with the Shevchenko Scientific Society to Category:Members of the Shevchenko Scientific Society
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Removes the vagueness of "associated with" while still reflecting the contents of the category accurately. Pichpich (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Armagh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename both to disambiguate from the eponymous County Armagh (often referred to simply as Armagh), and from the other places listed in Armagh (disambiguation) such as Armagh Township, Mifflin County, Pennsylvania (pop 4,000). The city of Armagh has a population of only 14,590, so it's a small city, but it seems to be the only Armagh which is actually a city. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Companies based in Juno Beach, Florida

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Companies based in Juno Beach, Florida to Category:Companies based in Palm Beach County, Florida
Nominator's rationale: Rename to a wider scope. There are around 3500 people in Juno Beach so this category is unlikely to grow. It's also important to avoid isolating companies in small categories that don't reflect the actual economic influence of a company: any business in this small town would typically have an impact on the whole county's economy. Pichpich (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Newton College faculty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Newton College faculty to Category:Newton College of the Sacred Heart faculty
Nominator's rationale: Rename to avoid ambiguity. Newton College (Japan) and Newton College (Peru) also exist. Pichpich (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2007–

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename per C2C. The issue in the sole objection has been taken to a new nomination. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2007– to Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2007–2011
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The assembly was dissolved on Friday. Philip Stevens (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Weslyan University alumni

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy merge due to typo.--Mike Selinker (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Weslyan University alumni to Category:Wesleyan University alumni
Nominator's rationale: Merge The name of the present category is the result of a typo. Pichpich (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians by alma mater:Visvesvaraya Technological University

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy merge due to typo.--Mike Selinker (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Wikipedians by alma mater:Visvesvaraya Technological University to Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Visvesvaraya Technological University
Nominator's rationale: Merge For obvious reasons. Pichpich (talk) 14:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Places affected by the 2010 Chile earthquake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Places affected by the 2010 Chile earthquake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: I don't think we should be adding any articles to this category, it is pointless. Most of these are already mentioned in the earthquake's article, and way too many cities/towns/beaches are not in the category, so... I say let's delete it. Diego Grez (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brampton FC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Brampton FC to Category:Brampton United
Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match name of article, Brampton United Mayumashu (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Freight rail transport in India

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename. Per C2C - convention of category tree. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Freight rail transport in India to Category:Rail freight transport in India
Nominator's rationale: To align with parent category Category:Rail freight transport and other countries in it. Hugo999 (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Critically-acclaimed cop dramas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Critically-acclaimed cop dramas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: To say that one thing is critically acclaimed and another is a job for the critics, not for Wikipedia Quentin X (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.