< August 7 August 9 >

August 8

Category:Fictional women soldiers and warriors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It is vague what counts as a "solider" or a "warrior". A more specific category such as "fictional women in military" might be useful JDDJS (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:903 Music singles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Neal McCoy (who owned the label) and Darryl Worley were the only artists to chart any singles on the label — and even then, only one single from each artist is significant enough to have an article. 903 Music doesn't even have an article (it redirects to Neal McCoy). There is no potential for expansion since the label is defunct, and none of its other releases have potential as articles. (For reference, the label charted a total of five singles — two from Neal and three from Darryl.) Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rocky Comfort Records singles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Label was only around for a couple years — Tracy Lawrence (who also owned it) was the only person to release any singles for it. And even then, he released only three singles. Of those three, Find Out Who Your Friends Are is the only one with the potential for an article. No other artist released any singles on the label, and it no longer exists. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine subcats

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 08:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming:
Nominator's rationale: Rename - while the parent category wll usually use the full name, I think e should shorten the names of the subcats. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Green Party (United States)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per C2D. The Bushranger One ping only 23:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Green Party of the United States is the official name of the party and the page was recently moved to reflect that. The category and sub-categories should be renamed as well for symmetry with the parent page, as appears to be standard on Wikipedia.--JayJasper (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Washington Metro stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The Bushranger One ping only 23:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rationalle: Undersized - scan finds only 40 articles for this stub category - while 60 is the standard minimum. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: If the number of stubs is reduced below ten, then you should consider moving them to US Rapid Transit stubs and deleting it. ----DanTD
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vlastimirović dynasty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per C2D and previous CfD. The Bushranger One ping only 23:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. "House of" is scarcely or never used to denote these families, and as per past CFD. Zoupan 08:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Orange Line (Los Angeles County Metro Liner)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename C2D. Timrollpickering (talk) 12:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Orange Line (Los Angeles County Metro Liner) to Category:Orange Line (Los Angeles Metro)
Nominator's rationale: Per main article (Orange Line (Los Angeles Metro)), as well as the realted articles about the other lines. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Florida Enterprise Zones

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 09:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One-article category, no other appropriate articles for inclusion, and the one article in it is miscategorised there. The Bushranger One ping only 05:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More