< September 6 September 8 >

September 7

Category:Equatoguinean expatriate women's footballers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:* Propose deleting Category:Equatoguinean expatriate women's footballers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intersection of nationality, sex, sport, and sub-genre of that sport. Upmerge to the women's and expatriates parents. (Note that there is no scheme for Category:Expatriate women's footballers by nationality.) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Withdrawn I'm making that scheme. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Hmlarson: You don't understand: they aren't in EG but from there originally. By definition, none of them are in EG. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Koavf can you clarify what specific categories you want to upmerge to? Hmlarson (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The proposal is withdrawn. I'm making that scheme. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Curaçaon expatriates footballers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Curaçao expatriate footballers. -- Black Falcon (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Curaçaon expatriates footballers to Category:Curaçaon expatriate footballers
Nominator's rationale: Spelling error ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gilgit-Baltistan education stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: redirect template and delete category (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Way too specialized at this time. I moved the one tagged article to the comfortably sized Category:Pakistani school stubs. Recommend renaming category to Category:Pakistan education stubs, and redirecting template to ((Pakistan-edu-stub)). Dawynn (talk) 20:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

GP2 Series rounds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted to CfD 2017-Sep-17 § GP2 Series rounds. Categories were not tagged originally; they are now tagged. -- Black Falcon (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D, closer to the names of the articles in this category and other series. Bbb2007 (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Full Metal Panic! technology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Full Metal Panic! (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, category is small and unlikely to get any bigger. Seems like a holdover from when there existed a lot more fancruft about the series.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Naive painters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. -- Black Falcon (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate of the latter which follows the main article spelling, naïve art. Brandmeistertalk 17:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian stock and station agents

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 3. – Fayenatic London
Nominator's rationale: merge, because the content of this category is companies only (in contrast to the New Zealand category below) the category is very poorly populated and it is not part of a broader scheme. The second parent category does not look like a very strong merge target, since these organizations deal with agriculture in general. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:New Zealand stock and station agents

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 3. – Fayenatic London
Nominator's rationale: "stock and station agent" is not a defining characteristic of the articles in this category. People involved are characterized more generally as farmers / land owners, or as merchants / business people. There are also a few companies in this category that can be moved to Category:Agriculture companies of New Zealand per WP:SMALLCAT like the Australian nomination above. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Power Snooker

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, after moving the 2011 tournament to Category:Snooker competitions per User:SMcCandlish. -- Black Falcon (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. There are only two articles in the category, and this snooker variant wasn't played competitively since 2011, so there is no room for expansion. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biomorphic robots

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Biorobotics. – Fayenatic London 12:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Biomorphic robots to Category:Biorobots
Nominator's rationale: According to biomorphism, it's more of an artistic/design movement than a description of robots. In other words, a way of incorporating natural patterns onto objects, not making them look like natural objects. Per Category:Biorobots in fiction, it would only make sense to make the category about actual biorobots called the same thing. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional asterozoa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Subcategory only contains one article and I doubt there are enough notable animated starfishes to warrant categorisation. Upmerge Category:Fictional asteroidea to Category:Fictional invertebrates. Sionk (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional myriapods

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category has only one member, which isn't really pertinent either (the vast, vast, vast majority of Battle Beasts are not myriapods). I'd be surprised if there are enough notable animated centipedes to justify keeping this category. Sionk (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1461 Trabzon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and move the subcategory to Category:Sportspeople from Trabzon (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No need for an eponymous cat--just upmerge the footballers category as needed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Homeless World Cup

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too little content. Upmerge as appropriate. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More