October 26
Category:Tatort (film)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 10:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Firstly, disambiguation is not necessary here, as we do not have another Tatort to compete with this one for the category name. Secondly, even if disambiguation were necessary, Tatort is a television series, not a film. Bearcat (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Criminal comedy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 10:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: As with Criminal comedy films, this genre of film and television entertainment is called "crime comedy", not "criminal comedy". The distinction is important, because crime comedy is not necessarily always about the criminals per se: it can also be about the crime victims, or the cops or private detectives trying to solve the crime. And similarly, our parallel categories for crime-related drama are all at "crime drama" rather than "criminal drama". Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Library websites
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: disperse, then delete. MER-C 10:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: seem to be the same thing Rathfelder (talk) 18:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Library websites is ambiguous. It could mean websites of traditional libraries, it could mean websites that are themselves libraries, or it could mean library (computing) websites. flowing dreams (talk page) 09:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose merge, not the same: digital libraries are for downloading/streaming electronic copies, and library websites include services that facilitate borrowing hardcopy books, per lead article Library website.
Instead, restructure, making Category:Library websites a parent of Category:Digital libraries instead of a sub-cat, purging Domínio Público and recategorising Hoopla (digital media service) in digital libraries. – Fayenatic London 10:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If we remove those articles - which are what confused me - I dont think Category:Library websites is worth keeping. Certainly in the UK it is normal now for libraries to have websites and online facilities. I think we should merge it into Libraries. Again, in the UK, and I think most of the world, now, all the catalogues are online. Its not a defining characteristic. The actual contents of Category:Online catalogues are a mess, and I think that should probably go too. Rathfelder (talk) 22:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a fair point. I would not oppose merging into Category:Online catalogues and Category:Libraries, and discussing Category:Online catalogues later. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 09:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support @Marcocapelle:'s support of @Fayenatic london:'s proposal to disperse and delete because, right now, we have a redundant category. Doug Mehus (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support recent consensus -- Most libraries have computerised their catalogues and make these available on-line. I know of a few cases where catalogues of older works exist only in hard copy or scanned images of card indices. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Bar-Kays albums
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 20#Category:The Bar-Kays albums
Category:Adult websites
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge manually. MER-C 10:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: No actual articles. Unnecessary intermediate category. Rathfelder (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
-
- A logical place to start if you were looking for articles on "Adult websites" would be Category:Websites by topic. Category:Sexuality and computing is not in that category, and even if it was it would be a less obvious place to look than Category:Adult websites. The object of categorisation is, after all, to aid readers to find articles. --John B123 (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
- I don't know how you can categorise Category:Adult social networking services, which is contained within Category:Adult websites, as pornography or erotica? - --John B123 (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- We can not. That's why it does not belong to a category named "Adult websites". Get it? flowing dreams (talk page) 08:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
-
- Your nomination above did give me that impression. 😉 On a more serious note, you can update the nomination statement, can't you? flowing dreams (talk page) 10:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 09:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This grouping isn't useful, users looking for "adult websites" would almost certainly be looking for "Erotica and pornography websites" and don't benefit from going through an extra container category. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Behavior models
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior models
Category:Behavior selection algorithms
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior selection algorithms
Category:Behavior modelling
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior modelling