Nick Stenning → WhiteInk

Nick Stenning (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 12 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 16:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emmasep → SR1973

Javért  |  Talk 04:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 13:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

maadllc → bigbill

Maad LLC (talk) 09:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I have notified the target username. Regards, Javért 04:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To be done tomorrow. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maad LLC -> Bigbill  DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 06:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hexagon1 → Happenstance

+Hexagon1 14:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7927 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 06:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonlet2 → Tisco

BlueMoonlet2 (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am actually established user BlueMoonlet. I would like to reclaim my old username (re-created yesterday), which I used for over two years until my rename in mid-2007, per discussion here. The target user page and talk page are already redirects to my own user page and talk page, and have been since my rename two years ago. --BlueMoonlet2 (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is to confirm that it is actually me making this request. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 04:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YATBot → JatBot

AHRtbA== Talk 15:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 0 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - if you'd mentioned that you had created the account "JatBot", we would have done it even sooner. WJBscribe (talk) 13:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islanders27 → IMatthew

Islanders27 23:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emw2012 → Emw

Emw2012 (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1559 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 06:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

danielricardo.santos → danielrs

Danielricardo.santos (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would like the "danielrs" username so I can unify my en.wikipedia.org login with my pt.wikipedia.org login

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Drive Media → anselm98

Drive Media (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ant2387 → Paul2387

pday2387 (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 5 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 5 total edits. Requesting user has 229 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


OrangeAlex → lzyastra

O-A (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 23 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Target username notified on talk page. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 00:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be done tomorrow. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done MBisanz talk 05:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Figuresk → Figures

Figuresk (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Request made to unify username with my other web uses. 'Figures' was created in August 2006 and does not appear to have made contributions.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • This username has not been checked by an administrator for deleted contributions.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set, and an email has been sent by a clerk or bureaucrat to notify them of this request. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 23:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 12:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nanotech Man → Magnesium

Nanotech Man (talk) 17:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I am requesting this usurpation of Magnesium based on 2 reasons:

Thank you for your time. Nanotech Man (talk) 17:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

 Clerk note: SUL account exists. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 23:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: This rename will detach you from your m:SUL. If you want to reunify your accounts, you will have to seek renames on other wikis. Is this something with which you're comfortable? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose so. Just to make sure I understand, Nanotech Man would only be renamed to Magnesium on en.wikipedia.org? (Thus, I would still log in to Wikimedia Commons, Wiktionary, etc. as Nanotech Man.) To fix it (i.e., log in as Magnesium on Wikimedia Commons, Wiktionary, etc.), I must submit a request at WP:CHU/SUL? Sorry, I just want to make sure I understand everything correctly. Nanotech Man (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and no. Nanotech Man would only be renamed to Magnesium on the English Wikipedia, but if you want your sister project accounts to be renamed, you'll need to make those requests at the local rename forums (for example, COM:CHU). WP:CHU/SUL is not for renames on other wikis; it's simply a subforum used for rename requests into global accounts, often from editors whose homewiki is not enwiki.wikipedia.org. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that sounds good. Rename me please! Nanotech Man (talk) 16:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anonymous Dissident; are there any problems? It has been almost a week since we last talked; could anyone perform the rename for me? Nanotech Man (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – Sorry for the delay. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Anonymous Dissident! I am now Magnesium! Magnesium 22:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


MDticko → MDt

MDticko (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 09:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gino Augusto Basilio → Mikebasilio

Gino Augusto Basilio (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 09:52, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stubacca → Stuart

Stu ’Bout ye! 11:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Stu ’Bout ye! 11:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

 Clerk note: SUL account exists. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 22:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 10:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore_Earl_Butler → Pbweil

Patrick Bertrand 16:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

G2sai → Ace of Spades

My current username was made on a whim, for I was not sure if I was to return to Wikipedia permanently. I would like my rights moved as well, if it is possible. Thank you. (C/SGT)G2sai(talk) 21:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1297 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done MBisanz talk 22:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zita purene → Zita Purene

Zita purene (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Zita Purene" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:33, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Windy34 → Windreaver

Windy34 (talk) 18:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then i want "windy34" be renamed "Windreaver". I want to unify "windreaver" here with my account "windreaver" on wikipedia fr. thanks

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

futureghost → future ghost

Futureghost (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Future ghost" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Philip R. Elliott → Bio_AGENT_Knowledge_Base

Philip R. Elliott (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Bio_AGENT_Knowledge_Base" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


wazdoggydogg → thewizardofwaz

Wazdoggydogg (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Thewizardofwaz" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


JohnJCapdevielleIII → Trey Capdevielle

JohnJCapdevielleIII (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Datestamp: 18:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Trey Capdevielle" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Wayne → The Arbiter

Status:     Done

Mr. Wayne (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC) Wayne is my last name, so I thought it would be clever to use it in conjunction with the "Batman" idea. Bad idea, so I'd like to get a completely anonymous name.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 152 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


VincentValentine29 → Cocytus

Status:     Done

Vincent Valentine 00:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Cocytus would be a lot shorter, is more memorable, and would help resolve the medial capital letter that has been causing me problems where I accidentally try to log in with a lowercase letter and my browser remembers it and forces me to edit my browsing history to fix the issue. Vincent Valentine 00:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4770 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SnoFox6161 → Snofox

Status:     Done

SnoFox6161 (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If possible, can my account be moved to "SnoFox"? (Note the capitalization difference) The account "Snofox" is most likely an old account which I no longer have access to. Thanks!

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O Cram → Ocram

Status:     Done

Ocram (talk) 03:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 66 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CrackerjackWannabe → Crackerjack

Status:     Done

CrackerjackWannabe (talk) 04:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Hello, I requested this username 2 and a half years ago but some admins thought it may be too soon. Crackerjack is a zero-edit account that has been defunct since it was created on 1 January 2006. It has been almost 4 years. I have been using the online name Crackerjack, first in the BBS world, and now on the Internet, since at least 1989. Since it is apparently not in use on Wikipedia, may I use it here?[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 122 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just wanted to say that I know this person and that Mr. Crackerjack(The one making the request, not the one who never edited) is a great benefit to any project he chooses to contribute to. Chillum 14:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seha → WizardOfOz

Status:     Done

Seha (talk) 10:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 144 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Message lived on the users talk page. --Seha (talk) 10:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am the user WizardOfOz on bs.wiki. I have leave a confrimation there. --Seha (talk) 08:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neeral → Ellusion

Status:     Done

- neeral - (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Request usurpation as Neeral was an old nickname, but Ellusion is both my online presence and domain. Account Ellusion seems to have no contributions since it's creation years ago. It also makes it easier for others to find me.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 43 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol → GossamerBliss

Status:     Done

Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I apologize both for the embarrassing conduct of my "doppelganger" and for my ignorance regarding the process of account compromise and changing one's username. Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 139 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sircls → Sirclz

Status:     Done

Sircls (talk) 10:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC) would like to use my former username please[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 2 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ozculer → Stambouliote

Status:     Done

I would like to change my username in order to get a global account and I dont want to use a username that states my family name.

Ozculer (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 652 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Avi (talk) 21:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Comet → Meaghan

Status:     Done

[midnight comet] [talk] 20:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Note to renaming bureaucrat: I would like all of the old redirects deleted. Thanks.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6271 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Obsidian → Yun-Yammka

Status:     Done

Dark Obsidian (talk) 14:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I would like to place a request to usurp the Yun-Yammka username, if possible upon changing username could the Dark Obsidian account be blocked afterwords. Dark Obsidian (talk) 14:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 364 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done With User:DarkObsisdian existing, "Dark Obsidian" will not be able to be created by anyone (other than 'crats, stewards, or developers). -- Avi (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dilson1 → dilson

Status:     Done

Dilson1 (talk) 01:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Dilson is my baptism name; if this username is not in use may I usurp it please.[reply]

Just so you know, the purpose of usurpation is to take over an account that already exists; since the Dilson account already exists, this request is fine nonetheless. (C/SSG)G2sai(talk) 21:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Avi (talk) 01:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hansbaer2 → Hansbaer

Status:     Done

Hansbaer2 (talk) 08:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Maybe I created this account accidently before. I would like to have it so that I can merge my account here with my account in the German Wikipedia.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 12 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Please confirm on your dewiki talk page that it's you making this request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have made a remark there [1] --Hansbaer2 (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Avi (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sauarbha → Saurabha

Status:     Not done

117.96.69.106 (talk) 13:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Saurabha" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Please log in to file a request –Juliancolton | Talk 23:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Neither username exists. Just register it. -- Avi (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tasoskessaris → Dr.K.

Status:     Done

That was a wonderful job. I am really indebted. I will not ask how you did it but the job you did was as close to wiki-magic as one gets. My thanks go to Anonymous Dissident and the rest of the crew. Take care all. It was a privilege. Dr.K. logos 11:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by AD (not a usurp - different spacings). -- Avi (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Godzfire3 → GodzFire

Status:     Done

Godzfire3 (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get my name correct

 Clerk note: User "GodzFire" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by EVula. -- Avi (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My name in the history.

Status:     Done

I asked that my name be taken off the history as it is my real name. I now use 'wycoller', but my name is still in the history of the John Sichel biography. Can you please take out Rigg.john and use 'wycoller'. Thank you. Below is as it appears now.

(Undid revision 320798896 by Rigg.john (talk)) (undo) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wycoller (talk • contribs) 05:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that is possible, but I will take a look. -- Avi (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I cannot change the name in the summary, but I have redacted the edit summary from the generally available history. Admins will still be able to see it, however. -- Avi (talk) 03:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MMGarth → MarcFresko

Status:     Done

MMGarth (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC) My name is Marc Fresko. I am reasonably confident that I created the ID "MarcFresko" back in 2006 then forgot it. So far as I can see it has not been used. I now wish to "reclaim" my name. I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia projects, but as Marc fresko, not MMGarth. Thank you.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 11 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 11 total edits. Requesting user has 43 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a real name? Intelligentsiumreview 00:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: I don't see how you can be "reasonably confident". Did you create the account, or didn't you? The account has been used; it's made 11 edits. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't be so conceited. I just forgot, that is all. I'm not a bot, I am a human, I forgot, that's all. That being said, your posting prompted me to think harder than I had before, with the happy result that I managed to remember the password I'd set up for User:MarcFresko, and I logged on to that account - about 6 minutes ago. Prior to logging on, I could not see a way of finding out that I had already made 11 edits as MarcFresko. I have now looked, and can see that it was me. I understand that your rules may not permit you to delete MarcFresko because of these 11 edits.
I understand the risks of using my real name (MarcFresko) instead of MMGarth. My objective is to have future contributions in the name MarcFresko, which I now can do easily. But I would also like past contributions by MMGarth to be recognised by my real name. What do you recommend please? Would a good solution be for me to simply change "MMGarth" to "MarcMFresko", as M is my middle initial?

MMGarth (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note:Mediawiki software does not allow for merging accounts. My suggestion would be to pick one account as your main one, and have that named "Marc Fresko" (space or CamelCase, your call). Have the other one named "MarcFreskoOld, or "MarcFreskoRetired" and then use an alternate account template, such as ((FormerAccount)) to point to the new account. -- Avi (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Avi. If I understand you correctly, this would have the effect that (a) all future posts would be fine, (b) all existing posts signed "MMGarth" would still show as signed by "MMGarth" - readers would not know that MMGarth is Marc Fresko unless they looked at MMGarth's user page. That is not what I am trying to achieve. Could we not change MMGarth to MarcMFresko, thus changing existing and future posts please?

Thanks

MMGarth (talk) 22:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note:OK, let me ensure I understand what you want. The account now known as "MarcFresko" should remain as "MarkFresko" and will be tagged "Former". The account now called "MMGarth" should be renamed to "MarcMFresko". If that is correct, please let me know, or correct the mapping. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 12:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Per this clarification. -- Avi (talk) 03:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J0ptionPane → JOptionPane

Status:     Done

J0ptionPane (talk) 06:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 467 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MarkSlap → Markmc

Status:     Done

MarkSlap (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC) I got this name at commons and at Swedish wikipedia. The user Markmc has not been active here at all and I would like to link my accounts. MarkSlap (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 10 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Please see WP:CHU/SUL. Intelligentsiumreview 01:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Message left today, so usurpation should not occur before Nov 2, unless SUL has a shorter period (see WT:CHU). -- Avi (talk) 15:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neovedanta → Swamiji

Status:     Done

GrooveDog • i'm groovy. 07:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neovedanta (talk • contribs) 04:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.


Elseused → Ewin

Status:     Done

Elseused (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 851 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Podkapova → Mmarsh

Status:     Done

Podkapova (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 4 total edits. Requesting user has 506 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SOM123Wiki → Stacey123

Status:     Done

SOM123Wiki (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 29 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 05:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes4me_v2 → yes4me

Status:     Done

Yes4me v2 (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Xytram → Martyx

Status:     Done

•xytram•tkcsgy 11:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set, and an email has been sent by a clerk or bureaucrat to notify them of this request.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 812 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Onewhohascomebefore → Beyond Birthday

Status:     Done

-- Rue Ryuzaki  jam  20:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Preffered username. The account I wish to usurp has not made a single edit since it's creation last year, so I think my taking it shouldn't be a problem. -- Rue Ryuzaki  jam  20:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 512 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Maksatmp → Maksa

Status:     Done

Maksatmp (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 44 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


WRNstaff → Reposioryhp

Status:     Done

WRNstaff (talk) 12:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to Wikipedia and wanted to create an article about the project I work on. I created a username that was generic to the project WRNstaff but was approached by User:Fribbulus Xax who expressed concern that my username represented a group and that went against Wikipedia policy. I went to the Wikipedia:Changing username page and the instructions said that if I had only made a few edits to just create a new username. I did this and created Repositoryhp. However I then worried that I would loose the article I'd created Welsh Repository Network. I approached User:Fribbulus Xax with my query and he said it would be preferable to submit a change of username request. However, from reading further on the page this is not possible as I've already created the new username Repositoryhp. Hence, why I am submitting a username usurption request. User:Fribbulus Xax seemed to think I had more than a valid reason to request this, and that a bureaucrat would be happy to help provided I stated the reasoning clearly.Thanks.--WRNstaff (talk) 12:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Reposioryhp" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ClueBot, but the user misspelt their target username. It has been fixed. Can you please come back here, ClueBot? — This, that, and the other [talk] 09:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I understand it was a misspelling; but I'd like the requesting user to come and change it rather than a clerk doing it. And no, as ClueBot is a bot; it won't run the test again. Pmlineditor  09:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean to be argumentative, but ClueBot's post includes a comment, whose text implies deletion of the comment will cause it to run its test again - I deleted that comment, so I would expect ClueBot to come back. My polite "request" to it was sarcastic. — This, that, and the other [talk] 09:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done MBisanz talk 08:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Navie05 → Nav

Status:     Done

 –Nav  talk to me or sign my guestbook 18:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 9 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 9 total edits. Requesting user has 1216 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done Edits not significant enough, and this user would have best claim to SUL. -- Avi (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Eachwiped → Ventur

Status:     Done

Eachwiped (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1352 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Shiftsonar → Halaster

Status:     Done

Shiftsonar (talk) 10:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 19 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Muazzes → Moe33

Status:     Done

Muazzes (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set, and an email has been sent by a clerk or bureaucrat to notify them of this request.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 146 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Notification added to talk page and email sent. Regards SoWhy 15:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


jmarrs → ljones

Status:     Done

GrooveDog • i'm groovy. 05:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified. GrooveDog • i'm groovy. 05:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Reformatted. GrooveDog • i'm groovy. 05:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


avanfeel → wbunge

Status:     Done

Avanfeel (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 7 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Target username notified. Regards SoWhy 12:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thech12 → Tech12

Status:     Done

Thech12 (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Notified target username. Regards SoWhy 12:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


RadicalTwo → RadicalOne

Status:     Done

RadicalTwo (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC) The original "RadicalOne" account appears to be completely inactive - only four edits ever, and the most recent was in late 2006 - and it is occupying my original intended username without actually using it. I therefore request a username usurpation. RadicalTwo (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 4 undeleted edits, 44 deleted edits, and 48 total edits. Requesting user has 192 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Target's edits not significant enough to prevent usurpation. -- Avi (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pmlinediter → Pmlineditor

Status:     Done

Pmlineditor  09:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I own Pmlineditor too. Pmlineditor  10:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Did you not just request a username change from Pmlineditor to Pmlinediter in June 09[2] (and before that from Pmlinediter to Pmlineditor [3])? Please explain why you want to change the name yet again. Regards SoWhy 13:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At that time, I couldn't get a rename on SimpleWP, since I was a bit confused, having little knowledge about SUL. Furthermore, I experienced difficulties in using automated tools such as Huggle and AWB. Since I'm quite sure that I will not experience such problems again, I want my account renamed. It has already been renamed on all wikis where I have requested except on en; so it'll be helpful if this is done. Pmlineditor  15:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6001 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Mixwell → Fail

Status:     Done

Mixwell!Talk 19:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6986 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done MBisanz talk 08:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]