Olvin34 → Olvin

Status:     In progress

Olvin34 (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For SUL.

My home page is uk:Olvin

Target user don`t have a page.

Also see confirmation request. --Olvin34 (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left message for the user who is being usurped --Olvin34 (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Email sent. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Objection received by email. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fmachado77 → Fmachado

Status:     In progress

Fmachado77 (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for the change: I don't know when but I did a registration here without provide my e-mail address. Anyway, as I don't want my fixes reverted (thank you smartbot), I'll use my account. Could you please change my username to my default? (fmachado) Thanks in advance.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please ask again when you are editing regularly. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Douglas Potter → Doug potter

Status:     In progress

Douglas Potter (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I set this up a while ago and never used it. I've since forgotten the password. I'd like to rename it to 'Doug Potter' and become more active in the community.

Doug Potter dpotter@newportconsulting.com Douglas Potter (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 6 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just notified the target username's user talk page in this edit.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Do you want "Doug Potter" or "Doug potter"? Your requested capitalization is unclear. Useight (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I notified the current username's user talk page of your question in this edit.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Ask again when you're participating regularly. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Tempddmcleod → ddmcleod

Status:     In progress

I forgot my password and the username was mine anyway. Tempddmcleod (talk) 06:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This user emailed me, asking to recover his old acct (ddmcleod), which had no email specified (and hence was unrecoverable). I told him to create a temp acct and then rename. ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 13:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly 2 weeks have passed, can someone look this over? ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 23:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Ask again when you're participating regularly. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dorisz → KristineZ

Status:     In progress

Dorisz (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC) I'd like to unify SUL under both en.wikipedia.org and zh.wikipedia.org. Thanks![reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 10 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The usurped account is less than 6 months old. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NazarK → Nazar

Status:     In progress

NazarK (talk) 13:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Moving my account to Unified Account (Single User Login). Thanks.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 469 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Duplicate request at CHU, already fulfilled. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pyro skwirel → Skwirel

Status:     In progress

Pyro skwirel (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I registered this username in the firstplace, as it would be the username I would choose, and then forgot my password, tried logging in a few times with no success so maybe not me. Either way, I cannot find reference to edits by this user, so would really like to usurp the name! Pyro skwirel (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 10 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Argueably the one and only edit by the existing Skwirel is in the sandbox, possibly by the owner to test the username. No edits with the username since. Is there any case for the usurp? Pyro skwirel (talk) 22:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm, I believe wording used is "Users with GFDL significant edits may not be usurped." Is a sandbox edit (which my poor knowledge/ability to search for means I cannot find it) significant? Sorry to nag! Pyro skwirel (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this edit was not GFDL significant, as it surely has not survived in the current sandbox.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please ask again after you've been editing for a while. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fabow → Omega

Status:     In progress

Fabow (talk) 04:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC) I wish to begin editing Wikipedia again after a hiatus, this current name I am using is difficult to remember. The one I am requesting is much easier to remember for me. I used to have an account a very long time ago, but I do not remember the username or password.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has 18 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The one undeleted edit was not in mainspace, so it should not be GFDL significant.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:55, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The question we have to answer is whether the edits are substantive enough to receive copyright coverage under U.S. law. While there isn't an exact threshold, anything more than a sentence is enough to raise concerns while a few spelling corrections are not. Neither copyright law nor the GFDL distinguishes between mainspace and everything else, though deleted content unlikely to resurface would not be published and therefore not require attribution. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please choose another username. We have to preserve the attribution of the edits made by the original Omega. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GK1973 → GK

Status:     In progress

GK (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

user:GK has been inactive for 4 years now and I already use GK as my nick instead of the longer GK1973. GK (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1876 undeleted edits, 127 deleted edits, and 2003 total edits. Requesting user has 2021 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done We have to preserve the attribution of the old edits. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Vili01 → Vili

Status:     Not done

Vili01 (talk) 20:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 14 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 15 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the target user's 14 undeleted edits are in mainspace, and are therefore GFDL significant.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Andewz111 → Puffy

Status:     Not done

Andrewz111 (typo intended) (let me know) 00:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: My username has part of my real name and I'd like to get renamed. Also perusing rename on Commons, so this becomes somewhat SUL too. User notified. Also, my present username has part of one of my emails. Andrewz111 (typo intended) (let me know) 00:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SUL report shows Puffy is in use on the Thai and Chinese Wikipedias.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I only edit on the English wikis. And I'm renaming on Commons. Puffy (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed on Commons today, this is SUL. I had a accidental account created on Commons unfortunately. I'm getting my SUL account deleted. Puffy (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1070 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would the bureaucrats hold this? I'm filing a RFB, and that may interfere with my request. Puffy (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC) It was declined. Puffy (talk) 00:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Puffy fish penguins 00:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: A (recent) SUL account for this username that appears to be unrelated to this user exists, userpation would cause an SUL conflict if the SUL owner requested usurpation here.   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the new SUL user has edits, I guess it's time to go ahead and rename to a new name, I guess. My account on commons is still named "Puffy". I'm making a new request. Puffy fish penguins 17:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As you have been renamed to User:OpenTheWindows per this log, is this usurpation request now moot?   — Jeff G. ツ 19:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Puffy@simplewiki emailed me and asked me to delete his global account, and I did so. I assume that this probably means that you can go ahead and usurp if you want. J.delanoygabsadds 06:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have my "OpenTheWindows" SUL. I'm going to have 3 SUL accounts, meaning like, 2 sockpuppets belonging to a renamed user left over from renames :) Instead, just usurp the user and don't rename me, that could be my automated editing account I guess. OpenTheWindows, sir! 00:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The account "Puffy" usurped so I can create the account. OpenTheWindows, sir! 02:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. OpenTheWindows, sir! 00:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rpla → pla

Status:     Not done

Rpla (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC) This request is to unify global login. User 'pla' seem not to have been active.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 10 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I left such a message in this edit.   — Jeff G. ツ 07:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


CycloneGU → Cyclone

Status:     Not done

Cyclone is my general online nickname. I didn't know we could usurp unused names for editing here. I see this one has been requested in the past; I've placed a second one today and am making this request, which is actually my first request, because I do not see any edits from the user in question on the English Wikipedia. I'd like my regular name. =) CycloneGU (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1895 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh...yes, I did leave a note on the talk page. Did I do it wrong? Can someone help me here? CycloneGU (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I forgot to timestamp it. Done now. CycloneGU (talk) 05:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've done my research on the previous submission. I see that "Cyclone" is a global user who has fewer edits on all Wikis combined than I do on this Wiki. Further, I noticed a global account controversy; I have plans to create a global account (despite being unilingual) because I intend to remain active at least on the English Wikipedia, but might make tiny contributions to other areas where possible (I've edited the Finnish Wikipedia, in fact, regarding a bridge collapse months ago with some figures but used my IP for those edits). Further, the user's edit count seems not to have risen since the last submission, but I cannot read Japanese so what do I know? =) CycloneGU (talk) 12:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samit Boonyaruk → RetiredUser123

Status:     Not done

Samit Boonyaruk (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "RetiredUser123" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may also want to visit WP:RTV.   — Jeff G. ツ 07:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kilbad → 1

Status:     Not done

kilbad (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to change my current username to something with more positive and unique overtones (i.e. the number one), moving away from my current name which has negative overtones (i.e. "kil" and "bad"). I had not realized I would become so active on Wikipedia, else I probably would have chosen a different name when I initially registered. Please also see a previous discussion regarding this username from January 2009, as that may be pertinent to this request. Thank you for considering this request. ---kilbad (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 28115 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seismic prods → seismicproductions

Status:     Not done

Seismic prods (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Skomorokh → Narodnik

Status:     Not done

 Skomorokh  23:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message for the target username in this edit and tried to fool the bot with Skomorokh's sig in this second edit.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although fooling the bot worked, it should not be necessary. Anyone should be able to notify the target username, and failing that anyone should also be able to modify the call to ((CUU)) to include "notified=yes".   — Jeff G. ツ 06:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 50885 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Noted.  Skomorokh  16:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beachcomber3 → Beachcomber

Status:     Not done

  — Jeff G. ツ 19:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per this request and this notice, the target username exists.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 6 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I left a message for the target username in this edit and changed notified=yes.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Beachcomber (talk · contribs) has requested that he wishes to keep his username. (Updated the edit count for target username.) —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 04:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Marked  Not done, owner does not wish to relinquish username. –xenotalk 01:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Root g → SuperRepublican

Status:     Not done

Root g (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to show my support for the GOP because I was an asst. manager during Obama's campaign.

 Clerk note: User "SuperRepublican" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:34, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I have requested this for the user at WP:CHUS#Root_g_.E2.86.92_SuperRepublican.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: That was completed by Nihonjoe (talk · contribs).   — Jeff G. ツ 00:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aalhambra → Doppelgänger

Status:     Not done

Aalhambra (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification
I would like to unify my accounts (I have an account on the Hungarian Wikipedia, and it's name will be changed to Doppelgänger.) As it seems, Doppelgänger used his/her account in a 7 days period (in 2004), and haven't made any GFDL significant edits. Neither me, I mainly edited the Hungarian wiki, but I'm going to change this. – Aalhambra (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've obtained the account Doppelgänger at the Hungarian Wikipedia. I also started to contribute in English articles. Is it possible that the target Doppelgänger account was used as a sock puppet in 2004? – Aalhambra (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does look that way. If you could figure out whose sock it is, maybe they would relinquish the name. –xenotalk 03:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you xeno, I try to figure it out. Should I ask for help at the Sockpuppet investigations, or just contact the puppet master? (I'm afraid even if I find out who it was, they're no longer available at Wikipedia.) – Aalhambra (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sockpuppet investigations wouldn't be able to help or (nor could they even if the data wasn't very stale - since there has been no disruption). I'm afraid there's really not much you can do to find out except maybe by researching their contributions and seeing of the master was around?... Sorry I can't be of more assistance. –xenotalk 15:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see, I just don't understand which of it's edits are significant, and more important why can't they be preserved under the name "Doppelgänger (usurped)"? I asked around about the sockpuppet where the user was still available, but obviously they don't remember anything after 6 years. Sorry for being "complicated". – Aalhambra (talk) 10:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The account "Doppelgänger" has made edits, the attribution of which must be preserved. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orange wanted please → Orange

Status:     Not done

Orange wanted please (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • Target username has 0 undeleted edits. Current username has 3 edits.   — Jeff G. ツ 22:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Blocked as a sockpuppet of AtlanticDeep by Risker. PleaseStand (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kujala 95 → ViciFR

Status:     Not done

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) (Errant simple rename request at WP:CHUS#Kim Kujala 95_.E2.86.92_ViciFR)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 18 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Target username has no edits; however, target username's account was created 21:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC), so by strict interpretation it cannot be usurped until 21:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC).   — Jeff G. ツ 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, it seems this one isn't quite usurpable yet. Was there another one you had in mind? –xenotalk 02:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1313-EvilHomer → Animevil

Status:     Not done

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 11 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Looks fine for June 20. –xenotalk 03:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this user has been blocked as a sockpuppet, and so I presume you will not want to carry out the rename any more. —Soap— 10:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You would presume right =)  Not done –xenotalk 12:46, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Shannon → Bam

Status:     Not done

Shannon ♫ (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to take on the nickname "Bam" here. I'd rather be a bit more simplistic as far as usernames are concerned.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 377 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ltr,ftw → ltr,ftr

Status:     Not done

Ltr,ftw (talk) 07:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Made a typing mistake when I was creating my account. As you can see, only the last letter is different. I have no intention of using "ltr,ftr" account any longer.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 24 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 03:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Bywater → Shadow

Status:     Not done

Scott Bywater (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC) I would like the username as I now have experience with contributing to Wikipedia and feel slightly uncomfortable with using my real name.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 49 undeleted edits, 14 deleted edits, and 63 total edits. Requesting user has 612 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy2010 → Astraios

Status:     Not done

Tommy2010 [message] 18:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Just for a change.. I think i've worn out this username. I'd also like the anonymity. Tommy2010 [message] 18:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 46089 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xplosionist → Cross

Status:     Not done

Xplosionist (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 5 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Svanslyck → Steev

Status:     Not done

kcylsnavS{screechharrass} 14:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of the other languages, you can use the interwiki links from this page to find other projects with separate usurp processes, the other ones without separate processes can be dealt with from the interwiki links from WP:CHUS. –xenotalk 17:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2249 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Bywater → SHADOW

Status:     Not done

Scott Bywater (talk) 19:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC) I would like to retire my current account and create a new account as per WP:CLEANSTART with the username SHADOW.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 623 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vvirumbi → vvirumbi

Status:     Not done

vvirumbi 22:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gezzza → Gerry

Status:     Not done

Gerry (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2244 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like to withdraw my request, thanks. Gezzza talk 12:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katrina(usurped) → Katrina

Status:     Not done

Katrina(usurped) (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC) My name is Katrina and I'd like to have that username if possible, please.[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonadea → Apteryx

Status:     Not done

I use the name Apteryx in a few other places.

bonadea contributions talk 08:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 30417 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I had not checked other Wikipedias - I am not that user. I have an editor account using the name Apteryx at sv.wiki, but have not used it for years and years. I will discuss it with the Czech Apteryx. --bonadea contributions talk 16:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is probably easiest that I withdraw the usurpation request. Hereby withdrawn. --bonadea contributions talk 13:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per above. –xenotalk 13:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Osmanjunaid → Osman

Status:     Not done

osmanjunaid 21:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 41 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on with this? osmanjunaid 20:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

The name is in wide use on other projects; and currently the user with the best claim to the SUL is it.wiki user Osman (talk · contribs); if we grant the name to you here, they will be unable to unify their SUL. As such, I am hesitant to grant this (since they've edited within the last six months). –xenotalk 14:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unwish → Track 9

Status:     Not done

 Clerk note: User "Track 9" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Bechamel1 → Bechamel

Status:     Not done

Bechamel1 (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 5 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 5 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This edit seems almost exact copy from the index page of software developer's website. It looks like copyvio and it is not fit with GFDL. Bechamel1 (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out, will seek advice. –xenotalk 16:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you the ru.wiki user? If so, please make an edit at ru:user talk:Bechamel certifying this request whilst logged in. –xenotalk 16:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am. Edit at ru:user talk:Bechamel already done. Bechamel1 (talk) 09:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Apologies, but target user objects. –xenotalk 13:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless thank you for your work. Bye. Bechamel1 (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Aravindvijayanpala → DAndC

Status:     Not done

Aravindvijayanpala (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "DAndC" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Mashedreport → Andrea Nicoletti

Status:     Not done

Mashedreport (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Andrea Nicoletti" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The name change is checkY done, the usurp was " Not done" (since there was nothing to usurp). –xenotalk 23:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forianz → Novallis

Status:     Not done

Forianz (talk) 10:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "Novallis" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

119.30.39.56 → music

Status:     Not done

119.30.39.56 (talk) 06:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 2 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hungtm → HungTM

Status:     Not done

Hungtm (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "HungTM" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gsorby → GSorbyDesroid

Status:     Not done

GSorbyDesroid 21:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "GSorbyDesroid" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SIYASTHEMA → ANEWU

Status:     Not done

SIYASTHEMA (talk) 09:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User "ANEWU" is not registered. Please see WP:CHU/S instead. ClueBot VI (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

81.50.176.182 → Critias

Status:     Not done

81.50.176.182 (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC) My login is unified on all the wikis except for the English one. The english user didn't contribute since August 2009. If he wants to keep his hame (which I completely understand), maybe there is another way for me to contribute in the English wiki under my current identity. Thanks, Critias[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 268 undeleted edits, -1 deleted edits, and 267 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK I understand but it's a real pity because I'd like to contribute a lot in en.wiki. Is it possible to usurp the name temporarily and cancel if the user wants to come back ? --86.218.173.151 (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Critias[reply]
Yea, this is unfortunate. I'm not going to decline this request, I'll leave it for one of the more experienced bureaucrats to decide if it can go through somehow. –xenotalk 21:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry but Critias has made too many significant contributions for us to rename that account. Also, users have been known to be inactive for a year and then return. I don't think our rename policies here allow this account to be renamed at the moment but - if SUL is ultimately to be given full effect - it may be that this request will need to be fulfilled at some point in the future... WJBscribe (talk) 12:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Verbalista

Status:     Not done

67.217.1.249 (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am wikt:User:Verbalista and would like to have the account here on enWP as well.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done as I see that User:Verbalista has chosen to be renamed to (and create a SUL as) User:Lexicografía. For the record, I would have had no problem with renaming an account for SUL purposes that objected where it had made no edits outside its own userspace. WJBscribe (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonkers191 → Johnson Capital Management, LLC

Status:     Not done

Bonkers191 (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auntie Beeb → Greaterlondoner

Status:     Not done

Auntie Beeb (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 401 undeleted edits, 100 deleted edits, and 501 total edits. Requesting user has 37 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


West Wallaby Street → Auntie Beeb

Status:     Not done

West Wallaby Street (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • The target username has Wikipedia user logs entries. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 29 undeleted edits, 12 deleted edits, and 41 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kenosis → K

Status:     Not done

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 21903 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shall we consult with that user and see if (s)he intends to get an SUL across wikis? My intention would be to use it only in en.WP. ... Kenosis (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please ask them about it. I was wrong above, no.wikt user has the best claim, but hasn't edited since 2008. With continued editing, the ja. user will eventually take over the claim and I wouldn't want to prevent them making a global SUL (or creating a conflict at en.wiki) if they have a desire to do so. –xenotalk 17:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will do. ... Kenosis (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The ja.wiki user hasn't responded at all. Nor has the no.wikt user. Neither appears to me to have email enabled. Any instructions on how to proceed? ... Kenosis (talk) 20:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's really nothing you can do. I might consider granting this if they were inactive, but they've last edited 25 July. This is before your message, so maybe just give it some more time. –xenotalk 20:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks Xeno. ... Kenosis (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More