21 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-21 Edit

2010-10-21 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Noncreative resume. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single short factual sentence. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. It seems to be an article of definitions from legislation (for whatever encyclopedic purpose that is), but the legal notice on the website explicitly claims copyright. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let's give this one a bit more time to see how the discussion plays out on the status of the EU. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS pending but not yet verified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of WP article pre-dates the newspaper article. Paraphrase sentences seem to have been added in one edit here. Not much editing since, so little would be lost if we reverted to last edit pre-copyvio. Image, added more recently, needs to be retained. PamD (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Thanks. Have done, but the image may wind up deleted as well. It looks very much like a derivative work. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More