|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Wrong redirect. Looks like blatant advertising of commercial "Ragnarok Online" game. What's the problem? Actually I had no idea what is this "eAthena" and wanted to learn meaning of this term. So I entered query to Wikipedia. Result was strange for me. There was something completely irrelevant - about some commercial MMORPG game "Ragnarok Online". This result is believed to be utterly incorrect. I did some investigation and discovered that there was older page but it has been deleted and replaced with redirect (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EAthena). After googling I discovered true meaning of "eAthena" term and it differs from what redirect displays. I believe such actions are either vandalism or blatant advertising intended to advertise commercial "Ragnarok Online" game on Wikipedia. As you can see, this resulted in false information represented to me, I believe such practice is unacceptable for encyclopaedia articles. The following issues were found with mentioned redirect:
If you want more common and clear example, imagine if there is redirection of "Apache HTTP Server" article to "Windows". Just because Windows supplied with IIS web server and both IIS and Apache implementing same HTTP protocol and Microsoft wants to sell Windows and shut up Apache, etc. So, if this redirect should exist, you should also create redirect from "Apache HTTP Server" to "Windows" as well ;) P.S. I'm sorry, I'm not a professional Wikipedia editor but rather casual visitor. If I did something wrong here, do not blame me too much. Instead, try to correct my faults and review my request based on Wikipedia goals and purposes rather than from bureaucratic and formal points of view. 91.77.158.255 (talk)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
While I'd agree some section might be construed as spamish, I do not agree that the article could not have been saved without major rewrites. I also feel that it did not qualify for G11 Speedy Deletion. Q T C 05:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The deletion log does not indicate whether this article was deleted following being tagged with a speedy delete, or whether the deleting administrator deleted it on his or her sole authority. The deleting administrator recorded WP:A7 as the reason for deletion. I don't know what the article said, at the time of its deletion, but I am sure a case can be made that the Foundation is fully notable. The deleting administrator hasn't been online in five months, so I would like to request someone else userify this article, its talk page and full revision history to User:Geo Swan/review/Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation. Geo Swan (talk) 04:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |