|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe the page was wrongly deleted because he passes general notability criteria for inclusion into the encyclopedia. And also have received some awards and recognitions in his field. I don't understand why he is not notable, I asked the admin to explain but he said is because of the number of votes for delete but I think, the reasons which are given in the AFD discussion by the participated editors are not a final thing or not to be the main reason/reasons (Judgement) in a deletion discussion. The participants share only their knowledge/thoughts/arguments in such discussions. The final or a conclusion reason/reasons should be taken by the admin who closed a deletion discussion and if mind, it should be indicated in the discussion result note User:Techwritar 18:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe the page was wrongly deleted because Firstly, third party sources (independent source) are sources that have no vested interest in a given Wikipedia topic and therefore is commonly expected to cover the topic from a disinterested perspective. All the sources there are third-party sources that have editorial independence. Secondly, he passes WP:ENT because he has a large fan base, one million subscribers and about 2.2 million views on one of his videos on YouTube. I don't understand why he is not notable, I asked the admin to explain but he said is because of the number of votes for delete but I think, the reasons which are given in the AFD discussion by the participated editors are not a final thing or not to be the main reason/reasons (Judgement) in a deletion discussion. The participants share only their knowledge/thoughts/arguments in such discussions. The final or a conclusion reason/reasons should be taken by the admin who closed a deletion discussion and if mind, it should be indicated in the discussion result note Techwritar (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe the page was wrongly deleted. First of all Miss Bikini Nigeria International, is a notable award in Nigeria. Secondly When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both but If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate. She is the winner, I don't think there is a role larger than that of this event. Thirdly, there are significant views about her published on reliable and independent sources and lastly, She has made a unique contribution and achievement to the field of entertainment as the first Nigerian model to be on a Dubai Magazine Cover. I don't understand why she is not notable, I asked the admin to explain but he said is because of the number of votes for delete but I think, the reasons which are given in the AFD discussion by the participated editors are not a final thing or not to be the main reason/reasons (Judgement) in a deletion discussion. The participants share only their knowledge/thoughts/arguments in such discussions. The final or a conclusion reason/reasons should be taken by the admin who closed a deletion discussion and if mind, it should be indicated in the discussion result note Techwritar (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |