Cremepuff222

Cremepuff222 (talk · contribs) Hello, and welcome to my editor review! Feel free to be as straight-forward as you want so that I can become a better editor. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

In conclusion, I suggest you step away from editing userspace, social chatting and fiddling with signature code and such, and start writing/improving some articles. I hope that helps. Majorly (o rly?) 02:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Overall, you have a decent editcount, but you still have quite a long way to go before you're ready for adminship. I wouldn't agree entirely with Majorly's comment about your sig - I don't think it's a major issue, but bear in mind that it does tend to annoy some users. Walton Vivat Regina! 17:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Most of my advice is this:

I hope this was helpful.  ~Steptrip 23:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might remember me from the MfD on autograph books. One small point: wasn't the consensus in favour of removing the "sign book" links from editors' signatures? As of your last post, you still haven't done so. I would recommend that you do so soon as leaving it would most likely draw more contention than it's worth. Ayla 23:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually pleasantly surprised that there are still editors out there receptive enough to accept a recommendation and act upon it without a long-drawn-out debate over its merits. Anyway, keep it up! :-) Ayla 01:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]







[1] is an edit you made that seems like a random meaningless message. Please don't communicate without stating what the message is for. --Canadianshoper 01:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC) Comments [reply]

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    This is very cliche, but I believe that all constructive edits, regardless of their sizes, are important for building a better encyclopedia. I like to contribute with minor edits, such as copyeditting and formatting, so that any visitors don't judge our encyclopedia by the cover. So, my answer to this question is that I consider all of my edits good ones.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    One particular conflict that I was involved in was what I call the "Jimbo Wales Impersonation Fiasco". This fiasco all started with a user signing my autograph book with Jimbo Wales's signature, so I reported him on the Administrator's notice board. The user felt that this was an overreaction, and he was willing to justify all of his doings. I, being a new editor, fought back with equal force, and many of my words violated policies such as WP:AFG and WP:CIVILITY. Looking back, I should have kept cool and tried to view the situation from the other user's standpoint. I learned a lot from this conflict, and I put it to good use in an MfD that I was involved in. In the future I'll be sure to put what I've learned from experience and other users and hopefully avoid any particualrly bad conflicts with other users.

Really, my only thing to suggest is get your experience up. You're a good editor with tons of potential, but you just need more experience. With this, you can do anything! Muahaha :D No, but seriously. Just keep up with RC and New page patrolling. Check out some AfD discussions, too. -- Theunicyclegirl 18:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]