The article was not promoted by User:Ian Rose 19:04, 25 August 2013 [1].
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria and is consistent with other FAs on specific Olympic Games. H1nkles (talk) citius altius fortius 00:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
Great work. Reywas92Talk 14:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great job on the article. Support Reywas92Talk 09:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
((flagIOC|ARG|1960 Winter|XX))
, where XX is the delegation size). As a source you can use Sports Reference Olympics; I've checked and they have delegation sizes there. Parutakupiu (talk) 21:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]— Parutakupiu (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, 1a. I'm finding too many errors, some of them basic grammar. I also find the writing to be quite imprecise. Examples:
This actually needs a lot of work, probably by an editor new to to text. Some of it is surface-level copyediting, but a lot of it needs to be rewritten to use more precise language. The whole thing needs to be checked for internal consistency of facts as well. --Laser brain (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]