Hey Chris, I know I just commented at the PR but some more things you could consider...!
- "Kit...is the standard equipment and attire worn..." and then "...specify the minimum equipment which a player..." - possibly you need to replace the "equipment" in the second sentence with "kit"?
- Done
- "numbers 1–11" - I know what this means but with my non-expert hat on, perhaps expand a touch so "numbers from 1 to 11, corresponding to..."...?
- Done
- Not overwhelmed by the lead image. I think it'd be a bit better to show a typical footballer perhaps so you have shirt, shorts, socks, boots as a minimum rather than just the jersey? Perhaps swap with the Stevie G image?
- Done
- "it is not unknown, especially at international level, for teams to opt to wear their away kit even when not required to by a clash of colours, or to wear it at home." - any chance of an example, say England's recent penchant for playing in red at Wembley a la 1966?
- Done
- "Depending on local rules, there may be restrictions on how large the logo may be or on what logos may be displayed.[9] A player's number is usually printed on the back of the shirt, although international teams often also print numbers on the front.[10] Professional teams generally use a squad number system and also print a player's surname above his number.[11] Competitions such as the Premier League may also require players to wear patches on their sleeves depicting the logo of the competition.[12]" - a number of short sentences, consider improving the flow of this section.
- Done
- Done
- Perhaps expand a bit on exactly why United changed at half time - I seem to recall they were 3-0 down at half-time and "won the second half" 1-0 in their traditional red?
- Done - I haven't specified it in the article, as I don't feel it's especially important and the source doesn't say anyway, but didn't they switch to blue for the second half? They couldn't have switched to red given that they were playing Southampton.......
It's an excellent article. Let me know when you've looked at these comments... Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks as ever for your comments, I've addressed them all now, I think.... ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]