The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 17:04, 10 June 2007.


University of Oklahoma[edit]

Previous FAC

The old nom was gigantic and I could not make heads nor tails of it. I'm resetting it. Raul654 23:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As stated in the previous review, this article does not meet WP:MoS, WP:GTL, and FA requirements. I think the article is good, but is missing key ingredients. Please realize that this is a cut & paste from the previous page. I spent a good four hours poring over it and I have no intention of repeating that. If an issue has already been addressed, please note it and I will cross it off. Comments and discussion from the previous review have been included

Reworded. still no references. Oldag07 03:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. source
  2. "25 years later." 25 years is redundant since both years are in consecutive sentences and serves no useful point until the next sentence, where it is far more appropriate.
  3. "He is the longest serving president in history of the university." Take out the adjectives at the beginning and you get "He is the president...", it should be "He was..."; "in history of" should be :#"in the history of..." Recommend rephrasing to, "This span of 25 years made him the longest serving president in the history of the university." or something similar
  • This is explained further down in the Oklahoma City and Tulsa secion.↔NMajdantalk 19:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • My problem is not with the new OU-Tulsa campus, it is with the placement of the adjective "new." The acres are not new, the campus is; therefore, "new" is misplaced. Perhaps "purchase of 60 acres (0.2 km²) for the new OU-Tulsa campus"?
  1. Source?
  2. "that is an OU-OSU partnership" very awkward
  3. "won a special award" how and what kind of special was it? was it special to you? was it special to the university? etc. (sorry for the sarcasm, but I'm just trying to make a point that it is vague and be a little funny at the same time)
  4. "the nation's leading professional society for those in the atmospheric and related sciences." Simply not needed. AMS stands alone, especially with a link to their page.
  • Reference 7 is unnecessary if "As of fall 2006..." is incorporated into the text.
  1. Reference 24 no link to the PDF or page number for the magazine
  2. Reference 25 should be a listed properly as a reference or be placed elsewhere
  3. References 77 & 80 are dead links
  4. References (such as 58 and 98) do not fill the proper fields of the given template and, therefore the works are not italicized properly: e.g. Time Magazine; this should be in the "journal" field. The "publisher" is not the name of the magazine. For Time, I believe it is "Time, Inc.", but it might be "AOL Time Warner." You'll have to check.
  5. And this is just a pet peeve of mine and I'm not sure if it's formally covered in the WP:MoS, but I hate it when references are out of order, e.g. blah blah blah.[21][7]
  • "The Norman campus is centered around two large "ovals." The Parrington Oval (or North Oval as it is more commonly called) is anchored on the south by Evans Hall, the main administrative building."
  • The media (map, audio recording, video, etc.) isn't terribly important. The questions to be asked are related to its reliability - Who published it? Are they trustworthy? Is it verifiable? etc. If you're confident in answering "yes" to those questions, then I don't see any reason not use a map as a reference. --ElKevbo 23:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • A map would be an ideal reference for this section. BQZip01 talk 13:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • "On the east side of the central part...honoring the Native Americans who defined so much of Oklahoma's history..."
  • "The portion of campus south of Lindsey Street...and features indoor and outdoor pools."
  • "Directly north of the main campus on Boyd Street...and the Norman population at large."
  • "South of student housing is Timberdell Road, the approximate southern boundary of the university. South of this road are University-owned apartments and athletic complexes."
  • "This area also includes many athletic complexes...completed on the south end of campus."
  • "The southern boundary of the south campus is State Highway 9."
  • "On the far north side of Norman is the OU Research Park...frequented by students with the exception of those studying meteorology or aviation."
  • "The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center...presence in Oklahoma City."
  • "The nineteen buildings that make up the OUHSC campus...and new scientific ventures."
  • "Established in 1972 as a branch of the main medical school campus....has grown but scattered."
  • "Construction on the new building is nearing completion."
  • "The Academic Arts Community, more commonly referred to as Cate 5 or Honors...with the Couch Cafeteria completing the residence community."
  • "Located in between Adams and Walker Centers is the Adams/Walker Mall...as well as its own computer lab and laundry facilities"
  • "Due to the lower cost of living in Oklahoma, many students find it financially viable to live off campus in either apartments or houses."
  • "The offices of many of these organizations are in the Oklahoma Memorial Union (student union)."
Also watch the weasel word "many". How about "a majority" or "a minority"
  • "The student union provides...bands, dances, give-aways, and other activities."
  • "A large intramural field...Members of the band are also present for many student events."
  • "The campus radio station...affiliated with NPR."
  • "Oklahoma has a strong social fraternity...Panhellenic Association was 3.30." dead link
  • "The main governing arm of the student body...located in the student union."
  • "The General Counsel is the chief legal counsel...all of the campus-wide events that happen on campus."
  • "The school's sports teams are called the Sooners...before the land run officially started."
  • "They participate in the NCAA's Division I-Bowl...nine sports for both men and women."
  • "...and seven national championships in football (football championships are not awarded by the NCAA)." Definitely need to prove this one. You may want to leave split championships out or they may cause problems.
  • "Many Pro Football Hall of Famers, including Lee Roy Selmon and Troy Aikman, also attended the University of Oklahoma." Also fix weasel word "many" or prove it and define "many"
  • "The men's gymnastics team has won seven national championships including championships in 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2006."
  • "60 acres site" fix adjective/noun agreement
  • remove parenthesis and replace with commas. There is a lot of this throughout the article that needs to be incorporated or replaced.
I have corrected the source of the image. I have also placed an InterLibrary Loan for the 1912 Sooner Yearbook. Surely, if it were published prior to 1923, it would be in either the 1912 or 1913 yearbook. I tried the 1912 first. This will take some time to resolve as history has taught me it usually takes 3-5 weeks to get an ILL.↔NMajdantalk 14:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In short, I feel that this does not represent the best Wikipedia has to offer and, therefore, should not be a featured article at this time. It can certainly be improved to meet this standard and time should be granted to make these changes. BQZip01 talk 17:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • So this is amounting to basically a reference for every sentence in the article. I'll work on what I can find.↔NMajdantalk 23:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia states "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." There are claims made and there is no reference given. IMHO, unless it is a widely known fact, e.g. "Birds can fly," then it should be cited.
  • Further: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies. The others include Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles. They should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should try to familiarize themselves with all three."
  • Some of the statements that the previous reviewer wants to be cited are difficult to find sources for, and some are almost borderline common knowledge, like Billy Simms going to OU and the fact that many students commute from Oklahoma City, for example. I would not hold it against this article if some of the "borderline common knowledge" statements could not be cited. It just might be hard to find sources for some of them, and I understand that. Okiefromoklatalk 01:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Respectfully, I disagree. Featured articles should be the example as to how to do an article. Took me all of 2 minutes to find and type the first reference:
  • Billy Simms went to OU.[1]
  • As for this second one, "many students commute from Oklahoma City," it uses the word "many," a weasel word which is trying to assert an obscure fact. "Many of the students..." How many is many? Is it a percentage? Is it more than 100? more than 500? 1,000? Stick with verifiable facts. "Students can commute from OKC..." and cite one instances of someone doing so. It is that easy. BQZip01 talk 03:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did not mean Billy Simms was hard to cite. I just meant that Billy Simms going to OU is borderline common knowledge. (I'm not objecting to it be cited, though). However, other things that may be of similar common knowledge may be difficult to find a reference for. For example, "Construction on the new building is nearing completion," may be hard to find a source for that as well, so it should probably be changed to the building's expected completion date. I, however, do not think it is controversial or widely unknown that students commute from Oklahoma City to OU. If there's not a source for this, I am not going to object to this article being a featured article. Saying that students commute from all over the Oklahoma City metorpolitan area (in different wording) is an even more reasonable claim, as OU is in the OKC metropolitan area. I would not object to that, either. My point is, after all the statements have been cited except those that are unable to be found and common knowledge anyway, we could look at some wording changes and I will be satisfied with that. The only agreement that could probably be reached (if there is no source to be found) is that some of the statements making a claim like "many students do this.. etc." could just be deleted all together. Okiefromoklatalk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Until I looked him up, I didn't know who exactly who Billy Simms was. I didn't grow up in the South. I had heard the name, but didn't know his significance, especially in relation to OU.
  • "Common knowledge" is a hard thing to nail down. I am trying to point out that things need to be sourced or rephrased. For example:
  • Commuting: Just state how far it is from OKC to the campus and state that it allows for people to commute: "Students can commute from the nearby OKC metro area..." Cite a source that shows the distance and add a comment that the distance can be inferred as a commutable distance. I've done this for a few dozen things that I couldn't find.
  • Claiming OU is in the OKC metropolitan area: Sure! Sounds like a solution, but again, just provide a simple source (if it is within 45 minutes of the city limits, then there is no issue). Maybe, "The Norman campus is within 45 miles of OKC, making it possible for students to commute from the metro area..."
  • As for "The only agreement that could probably be reached (if there is no source to be found) is that some of the statements making a claim like "many students do this.. etc." could just be deleted all together." is ridiculous. If you can't back up a claim, then it is not verifiable and as it states in the box below where you edit your posts: "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" (emphasis added).
Speaking as somebody from Scotland, I have neither heard of Billy Simms nor the University of Oklahoma. TimVickers 03:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As I had said in the previous version, the article is right now not feature-ready but it could be with some work, as has been outlined above. I will gladly support the article if the issues are taken care of, but with the length of time this article has been a candidate and the fact the the editors have all but given up entirely (see previous version) it doesn't look like any big changes will be made any time soon. Okiefromoklatalk 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concur BQZip01 talk 04:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. ^ "All-American: Billy Sims" (HTML). SoonerSports.com. 01/13/2004. Retrieved 2007-05-18. ((cite web)): Check date values in: |date= (help)