The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 7:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC) [1].

Baltimore City College[edit]

Notified: Bcc07, Golem88991, 67knight, Basic Editor, Amerikasmuse, WikiProject United States, WikiProject Maryland, WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, WikiProject Schools, Jan 10, 2021

Review section[edit]

I am nominating this featured article for review because there has been minimal engagement on the article since I left a notice. Concerns include the lede which leaves out aspects of the article's body (criteria 2a), the history section which has no information after 1978 (criteria 1b) and non-notable faculty members and principals listed in the article (criteria 4). Z1720 (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added some comments on the talk page as well, but the article could also benefit from revamping and properly sourcing the enrollment section, removing other non-notable individuals from the article (beyond just the faculty members and principals section), and cleaning up particular sections. Hoping there are editors available to help bring this article back to the criteria. Deltawk (talk) 02:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I've nixed the redlink notable faculty from that section. Personally, I think it would make more sense to combine the notable faculty and alumni into a single section (after purging mentions of NN people). I think it makes sense to have a list of principals of the school somewhere, but I'm not sure how this should best be done. It's currently located at History of Baltimore City College, and the list here looks incomplete, poorly cited, and otherwise flawed. Hog Farm _Talk 17:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, no real progress. Hog Farm _Talk 22:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, tons of unsourced and missing content. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. DrKay (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delist still quite a mess, lacking content, lacking citations. FemkeMilene (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - Significant issues outstanding and no significant work has been done yet. Hog Farm _Talk 05:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, a mess of maintenance tags. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the ((featured article review)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.