The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 5:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC) [1].

---

Notified: User talk:Leftism; WT:BIOG; WT:SPORTBIO; WT:F1; WT:MOTOR; WT:BMS; WT:WALES; talk-page notice 2022-02-23

I am nominating this featured article for review because the concerns mentioned on the talk page by SandyGeorgia – uncited text, incomplete citations, and sources of dubious reliability – haven't been addressed. I think someone with access to the sources could probably bring this back up to standard without too much trouble, but at the moment the FA criteria aren't fully met. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to FARC no improvement. (t · c) buidhe 10:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC - bits and bobs of uncited text throughout and I'm not sold on the reliability of a number of those web sources. Hog Farm _Talk 15:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC no improvements since Sept., uncited concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist no edits since Sept, sourcing concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – no progress. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - sourcing issues remain. Hog Farm _Talk 20:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the ((featured article review)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.