• • It hadn't crossed my mind before I saw your effort, so thanks.
• link "Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation" first time around.
  • Linked.
• innovative use of table legend.
  • Thanks, I like avoiding white space if possible.
• why did you split the stats table in two?
  • I thought readers might want to sort winners and "also-rans" separately. It would be straight-forward to merge them if needs must.
• "winners" seems to be randomly sorted initially.
  • They're listed chronologically if teams are tied.
    • If I sort by total and then by winners I no longer get the original listing (IE on XP). Sandman888 (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • That would be because its listing them in order of wins and then total, unless I'm missing something? As far as I'm aware you can't reset a sorting table without refreshing the page - that is what I do anyway. Argyle 4 Life^talk 06:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • I believe that the initial sorting should be available after re-sorting without refreshing. Why don't you just sort them by wins and then totals to start with? Sandman888 (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done.
• no scores?
  • What do you include and what do you leave out? In its current format, its possible for the winner and runner-up not to play each other.
    • Ah, ok. Sandman888 (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. Argyle 4 Life^talk 08:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • "... while Belgium has produced the most individual winners; four. One more than England and Netherlands." — I'd replace the semicolon and period with commas, thus joining the two related sentences;
    • Done.
  • I would much prefer that winners and non-winners be presented and sorted in a single table. Parutakupiu (talk) 19:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Your wish is my command. Argyle 4 Life^talk 04:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Four teams participate in the competition, which has been in a league" maybe "...competition, played in a league..."

Done.

• "Since its return in 1999," not convinced you need to repeat this information which you gave some two sentences ago..

Removed year to avoid repetition.

• "Ajax's main domestic rivals" I think we all know they're the "main" rivals, but without sourcing, this could be misconstrued as POV, so maybe just leave it as "Ajax's domestic rivals"?

Done.

• You link Belgium, but you didn't link Belgian, which appeared a few lines beforehand...

Delinked for consistency.

• Q: Is there any guide to who was invited? I noted my lot were invited after winning the FA Cup. What about the others?

I couldn't find anything reliable. The first tournament included Molenbeek as Belgian champions, but Feyenoord and Barcelona didn't appear to win anything in the previous season.

• Cruyff caption, could you put some dates on his involvement please?

Added that he scored once in the first tournament.

• Typically we expand and link RSSSF in the references as it's a bit nebulous for non-experts.

Should I definitely link RSSSF in each reference? I thought it might be considered overlinking. I've added its full name while its linked at the top as a general reference.

Okay, that's fine by me, I missed it, sorry. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Refs 34 to 38 need an en-dash, not spaced hyphens.

Done.

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Argyle 4 Life^talk 05:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]