The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:19, 11 August 2012 [1].

---

Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film[edit]

Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film/archive1
• Featured list candidates/Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film/archive2

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): GoP_T^C_N 07:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing much happened since the first nomination. The recent winner was The King's Speech by rising star Tom Hooper, the first non-American production since 2007. The Russian Golden Eagle Awards is equivalent to the Golden Globes. I think that this category is the foremost under the Golden Eagle, so I decided to nominate this first and will think twice if other subarticles should be nominated here. Regards.GoP_T^C_N 07:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks like this list meets all 6 FL criteria. The prose flows well. The lead (though relatively short) is succinct and to the point. Structure is well-organized (though for the table key, you could choose to centre the title and remove the headings "Sign" and "Meaning," as other FLs like 3,000 hit club don't utilize headings for table keys). Style is aesthetically pleasing and follows MOS. Obviously very stable. In addition, the references used are vast and encompass every detail in the table. Overall, an extremely impressive list. —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review :). Regards.--GoP_T^C_N 16:50, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support on prose, though I'm not sure how necessary the # is for winners, since you have already highlighted them in blue. Also, should the † symbol come after punctuation? AGF on the Russian sources. Ruby 2010/2013 20:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. I moved the daggers after punctuation. Regards.--GoP_T^C_N 15:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments In response to above, # (or some other symbol) is required along with the colour, per WP:ACCESS. Ref(s) is just Refs since there are always multiple ones. I only count 16 USA noms. Joanne Sellar is JoAnne Sellar. "Yahoo!." Avoid the double dot here, you may need to be clever about the use of templates. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Done all. Thanks for your comments. Regards.--GoPTCN 11:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 16:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments – "The nation with the most cumulative nominations are the United States". "are" → "is". Sounds odd. I thought the United States are a plural? Nevermind. Changed to is Could add "the" before United Kingdom. Done What makes IMDb (ref 18) a reliable source? Giants2008 (Talk) 00:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] It is actually Yahoo. Thanks for your comments. Regards.--GoPTCN 08:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The Producer column is sorting by first name and not last. Could try sorting it by the last name of the first director listed, although I grant that it's difficult to have sorting that works well for a column with multiple items like this one.

• Yes, that is the reason why I did not change it.--GoP_T^C_N 08:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Quick comment: I'm having problems. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it is your browser, as it is fine for me on all resolutions and on all browsers. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 08:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• No, errors on Chrome as well. I'm stuck at 1024*600 px (netbook) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:51, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know. Does this error occur only if you view this article, or also on other similar articles, eg Golden Eagle Award for Best Motion Picture? Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 09:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Same issue. How much of our readership is stuck on such a small resolution? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I added "upright" to the pictures. How about now? Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 09:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yep, that's peachy. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Not much prose, and didn't see any mistakes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments and support. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 10:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per above. I removed the hashtags from the winning films, since they were unnecessary due to the shading. Nice work -- Wikipedical (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think they should be there as per WP:ACCESS, but let's see what others think. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 08:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep a symbol is necessary per WP:ACCESS, as colour blind user won't be able to identify the shading. I wouldn't use the hashtag as the symbol though <code>((double dagger)) would be better. NapHit (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Kürbis (✔) 16:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.