The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:11, 27 May 2011 [1].

Grammy Award for Best Remixed Recording, Non-Classical[edit]

Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Remixed Recording, Non-Classical/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the few categories not being altered next year. I have not included the original artists of songs, as the prize is awarded to remixers only, but lemme know what you think. Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dab/EL check - There are no dab links but there is one dead link. GamerPro64 03:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Looks great! I would recommend "commanding" the Nationality column to be wide enough to accommodate the length of the widest entry (UK) so that is does not wrap to a second line. ~~I think I used 125px before?~~ (Edit: For accessibility purposes, you might want to look at the scope/width formatting on the Jazz Fusion list.) --Another Believer _(Talk) 13:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. Adabow (talk · contribs) 19:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Are original artists for the track on which the remix is based available for this list? I could probably hunt them down, but the award is not awarded to the original song. If I was to add the original artists, where would I place them? Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Trentemoller has a diacritic on the o in our article. Fixed Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Cat says established 2002, first award on this list was given 1998. Oops, forgot to change it when I merged the two. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Are original artists for the track on which the remix is based available for this list?

I could probably hunt them down, but the award is not awarded to the original song. If I was to add the original artists, where would I place them? Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trentemoller has a diacritic on the o in our article.

Fixed Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cat says established 2002, first award on this list was given 1998.

Oops, forgot to change it when I merged the two. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks like one more picture could fit, is their another suitable one?--Blackjacks101 (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly I see nothing wrong so I will support--Blackjacks101 (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I notice that the table lists the song title and the name of the remixer, but not the artist whose song it actually is. Is this because this is how the nominations are worded by the Academy........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Academy awards the remixer only, and does not make any mention of the original artist. However, (for the 49th awards at least) the original artists were listed alongside the nominees. So the award is not at all given to the original artist, but I am more than happy to include original artists. I'll need some creative direction, though, as I can't see a non-awkward way to include them in the table. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it's how the Academy present the information then that's cool -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - all seems OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.