The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:14, 17 May 2011 [1].
Led Zeppelin discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I improved some things after the first nomination, including some peak chart positions, which were wrong. Also reassessed small things like spaced em-dashes, newspapers not in italicface, references missing and organisations not wikilinked. I hope it passes this time. Happy reviewing.♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 15:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Resolved comments from Novice7 (talk) 10:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply] |
---|
Comments –
Thanks for the review.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 15:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply] |
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 16:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Why are the album tracks "Darlene", "Ozobe Baby" and "Poor Tom" listed in the singles discography? None of those songs were released as singles. Piriczki (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Some might think this as being a bit pointy since I recently got into a discussion about it at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Backstreet Boys discography/archive1, but, <shrugs> that's for the closing director to decide. I was told there that this is common practice at discography pages recently, and I think it has to stop:
"GER" has no meaning. I could accept it in an Olympic- or football-related article, but that isn't the case here. We should use international standards for abbreviating country names when a differing standard hasn't been approved (such as in the two cases already mentioned). GER is not an acceptable abbreviation in regular usage, and a list that "exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work" shouldn't be using it. So, while the article continues to uses abbreviations pulled out of our arses, I will have to oppose. Matthewedwards : Chat 06:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
|