**Firstly, the lead is littered with song titles. Instead, you should list some of the more popular ones and list their accomplishments.
- Done I changed completely the lead. Deleted the list of song titles. Check it.--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The lead is not very-well written and is missing sources.
- Done. Added sources to the lead--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You violate MoS issues quite frequently.
- Where?--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC) If it was the albums linked on the single tables, I just unlinked them.2--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To reduce bulk, we do not include certifications that are not in the table, like most of the ones you entered. This has been told to you in the previous FLs
- Done--Neo139 (talk) 06:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The list of countries in the table should be consistent throughout the article, not changing after every table.
- Done--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The EPs are unsourced. How are we to know they exist if they never charted anywhere?
- Done--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How are the other songs from different albums "as a featured artist"?
- I don't understand what you mean--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Videos that have not charted anywhere need to be referenced. How do we know they exist?
- Done--Neo139 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You have fixed up some stuff, I still have some concerns. The lead is unimpressive. This needs fixing. YOu have it littered with song titles. Make it read from one sentence to another, like a history book. Look at other fellow FLs to see. Also, you should put a * before every countries certification. Work on this and I will take a look at the references.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed lead. Check it^^--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I see you have fixed up some things, and it is looking better. The lead is still a big issue. Aside from the aforementioned problems with it, you have quite a few grammar issues. To sample, you refer to the band as "it" this is weird, they should be referred to by name or they, it is an album, song or object. Next, these are the sourcing issues. They are quite frankly missing a lot. Almost every ref has issues, here are a few samples.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)ç[reply]
- Changed Its-->Their --Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 1 - Askmen.com is not a reliable source.
- Done Replaced--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 2 - is missing a work and/or publisher - Now that I look its unreliable, popstarplus.com
- Done Replaced--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Added Prometheus Global Media as publisher in all the billboard sources--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 4 - allmusic is the work, All Media Guide (its owner) is the publisher. allmusic.com does not work here. There are many more, as I said, lots to do.
- Done Fixed all allmusic sources.--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I have added publisher and work to all the refs I could found that information.3--Neo139 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Getting there. Still to do. The lead is looking much better. You should include info on their US sales and certifications, as well as some of their higher European or Asian certs. Also, it would be beneficial if you included another column for sales in the US (soundScan sales which can be found anywhere). Next, you should align the tables to be the same length. Ref problems still present. To reference the Grammy awards, use this the Grammy official website (rockonthenet isn't reliable). Now for refs.
- Done I added a bit about US certifications and Europe cert in the lead. I added a column to albums for Sales in the US. Now the tables have the same width (1000). Deleted rockonthenet source and added grammy website. --Neo139 (talk) 06:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Neo139 (talk) 06:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 8 - Missing date - People is the work and Time Warner is the publisher. There still so many refs with issues. Take the tips I gave you and apply them everywhere.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Added Time Warner as publisher. Sometimes I'm not sure who is the work and who the publisher :\ --Neo139 (talk) 06:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it to neutral for now, as you have definitely improved it a lot. There are still issues, which you will have to fix to earn my complete support.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 07:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- have been certified as Platinum -> they have been certified at least platinum
- Done. --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Their hit single "In the End" -> This is not neutral
- Done. Deleted the word hit --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. The Times was work, and News Corp the publisher. The problem was The times had semicolons --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Some as above. Also, changed author= for first= and last= --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- REF 6 - Billboard doesn't come up as italicized. When you put the work=, you don't have to place italics on each side of the work, it does it automatically. Placing them has the opposite effect.
- Done Fixed all billboard refs--Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- REF 8 - not properly formatted.
- Done author-> first= and last= changed --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- REF 9 - ifpi.org doesn't belong here. Just IFPI like you have
- Done--Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- REF 11 - not reliable to source this
- Done. TIAYN fixed it =P --Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- REF 15 - Missing date, author and link MTV and the publisher is MTV Networks. Same with REF 18
- Done Added date, link and author. Also removed the link to the next MTV ref to avoid WP:OVERLINK, added publisher to both ref 15 and 18. Also, I not sure if I have to add the MTV Networks publisher to all the MTV references or just the one that are MTV News. (Most MTV Ref are links to videos)--Neo139 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Many more issues continue.
|