• "A Test match is scheduled to take place over a period of five days" what about timeless Tests?

• Oh, and this, could be a footnote.... The Rambling Man (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The first Test can be linked, there are a couple of possible targets, e.g. English cricket team in Australia and New Zealand in 1876–77 or History of Test cricket from 1877 to 1883#The first Test.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "have played 801 matches against every other Test-playing nation" picky but that sounds like they've played each other nation 801 times.

• Removed "against every other Test-playing nation" – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "well ahead of" avoid "well" here, shades of POV!

• Removed "well" – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "Bradman still stand" would add "also" before "still" here.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "He is second only " in world cricket.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Why is the ICC Test Championship table there in the Key section?

• It was a carry over from the Sri Lankan list. Agree it seems out of place. Removed – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A general comment, it would be nice, especially for non-expert reader, to have some analysis ahead of each table, or at least some prose to introduce each set of stats.
• "=5", is that an ENGVAR thing? I would write "5=" because logically to me that reads as "5th equal". Not unduly concerned.

• Is that what you Brits say? In Australia, we say someone finished in equal 5th? [2] – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Since this suggests that Oz are the only team to be involved in more than one tie, I guess that's a Test cricket record?

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Any golden ducks? Diamond ducks? Anyone to trouble Daddles??

• Not done. A couldn't find any reliable sources for this sorry. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A lot of whitespace on the right-hand side, and plenty of opportunity to use some more classic images of historic cricketers...

• I have added images of J. J. Ferris, Jack Gregory and Bill Ponsford. I have also added a photograph of Steve Waugh in the Team records section – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Update – I have added three more images to the team records section, one of Border, one of Neil Harvey and one of the 1902 team that toured England – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Every "over" record came from six-ball overs?

• Excellent pick-up TRM. I have added a note to the Worst figures in a match table where Lindsay Kline's 0/157 came off 8 ball overs – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I have a nagging memory of the flag used in West Indies cricket, has it been the same since the beginning of their Test status?

• You're memory is correct on this. File:WestIndiesCricketFlagPre1999.svg was the flag used until 1999. File:West indies cricket board flag.png is the flag that has been in use since 1999. The former is now in the public domain whilst the latter is under copyright. ((cr|WIN)) calls up the former flag and is used for post-1999 Windies teams, even though it is anachronistic – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Just a bizarre thought struck me, what about Australian Test umpires?!

• Good one! I have added a table for most matches umpired – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice. One thing that maybe useful, in the Ducks table, is the amount of innings these guys had. I'm not sure why runs is relevant, although I can accept that even though Waugh had loads of ducks, he made loads of runs, I just think their innings (or their batting average?) would be more appropriate as a comparison. Also, I think an explanation of a "five-wicket haul" preceding that table would be good. Otherwise this is top notch. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Minor point, but the "also" in "A further two Australian partnership records for the second and the sixth wickets set by Bradman also still stand" is a redundant word (given the presence of "further") and could be removed to tighten the prose.

• Removed "also" as suggested – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comma needed after Glenn McGrath, I'd imagine.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Key: The highest wicket partnership link isn't working properly; you might need to check the capitalization.

• Great pick up. Link fixed and reworded. – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Team wins, losses, draws and ties: Add "in" after "resulting" at the start of the second paragraph.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove first "a" from "Australia has a never lost or drawn a match against Bangladesh or Zimbabwe.

• Done, also added refs to support these claims. – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• It says here that England have competed in over 1,000 Test matches, while the lead says just under 1,000. Which is it? Also, this should be cited here.

• Ah, my mistake! The lead is correct, it should be under. They have played 983 matches to date. I have corrected this and a ref has also been added. – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 1902 photo caption: At the end, shouldn't "narrowest lost" be "narrowest loss"?

• Yes, you are correct. Caption amended. – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Most centuries: Needs "a" before "score".

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Same for the double century section.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Best (bowling) figures in a match: "to with finish with match figures of 19/90" needs copy-editing.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Worst figures in a match: Could use "the" before "second Test of the Ashes series".

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Most dismissals in an innings: Try not to start a sentence with a number, like in "22 wicket-keepers...". In this case, you could just spell out the number.

• Reworded sentence – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Most dismissals in a series: "Brad Haddin holds the Test cricket record for the most dismissal taken by wicket-keeper in a series." Needs "a" before "wicket-keeper", and "dismissal" should be plural.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giants2008 (Talk) 21:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Most matches as captain: "holds the record the most matched played as captain in Test cricket with 109." "matched" is a typo, and a word is needed after "record".

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Partnership records: Middle two words of "In sport of cricket" could be removed to improve the sentence.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Highest partnerships by wicket: The Wicket column of the table isn't sorting properly. You'll need sort templates to prevent the 10th from being sorted with the 1st (a common issue in lists).

• Another great pick up. Thanks Giants – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Giants, thank you very much for the review. I have addressed all of your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Giants, I have added and amended some of the prose in the team and batting records sections. If you could please review and let me know if you have any further comments that would be greatly appreciated. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Is "for" needed in "holds the record of the most wickets for taken by a fast bowler in Test cricket."? Actually, it sounds like "holds the record for" would be better.

• Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Now I see two "for"s in that sentence. The one after "most wickets" should be taken out. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Giants, I have fixed the sentence. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]