Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- The alt text is still not there. See Wikipedia:Alternative text for images#Flawed and better examples for what I mean.
- "The Copa Libertadores is a seasonal association football competition established in 1960." Insert "that was" before "established"; it makes for better reading.
- "league champions of
all Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (CONMEBOL) member associations"
- "however during the 1970s"-->however, during the 1970s
- "Independiente hold the record"-->Independientes hold the record
- "Boca Juniors are second with six wins, they won their last title in 2007. " Semicolon, not comma.
- "Peñarol are third with five wins, though their last title was in 1987."-->Peñarol are third with five wins, their most recent of which was in 1987.
- "Peñarol and América de Cali hold the distinction of losing the most finals, each team has lost the final on four separate occasions."-->Peñarol and América de Cali have lost the most finals; each team has lost the final on four occasions.
- "with 21 wins between them. "-->with 21 wins among them.
- We shouldn't be using bold to note things; use italics instead.
- Why is bold no longer used, I see no reason why it shouldn't be. NapHit (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MOSBOLD. Yes, reviewers have been lax about this in the past, but we're cracking down on things that we didn't bother about a few months before. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Key needs a note explaining that each year links to an article about a Copa Libertadores for that year.
- In the colspans, use semicolons, not commas, to set off phrases. Example: "2–2 on points, Independiente won playoff 2–1 at Estadio Centenario †"-->2–2 on points; Independiente won playoff 2–1 at Estadio Centenario †
- "2–2 on points Independiente won playoff 2–0 at Estadio Defensores del Chaco"-->2–2 on points; Independiente won playoff 2–0 at Estadio Defensores del Chaco Dabomb87 (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Other the bold issue all requests done. NapHit (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I still don't see alt text. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done the italics, I really don't know what to put for alt text, so hopefully, after your edit it's alright? NapHit (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not put in alt text; I just copy-edited the caption. Alt text is used to describe images for those who cannot see them. While captions "interpret" or explain the importance of the image, alt text merely describes the image. Here's an example:
[[File:FamousFootballPlayer.jpg|thumb|alt=Man kicking a ball (this is the alt text)|Mr. Football is the best soccer player in the world (this is the caption)]] . Obviously, you should be more descriptive, but that's the gist of it. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chnged it again, think I've got it now? NapHit (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately not. Captions and alt text are different things, and the image needs both. I've added an empty
alt= to the image so that you know where to put it. The alt text should describe the appearance of the trophy (color, shape, size, etc.). Dabomb87 (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is everything in order now? NapHit (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|