The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:37, 21 April 2009 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a comprehensive list of all the highest graded listed buildings in the Unitary Authority or North Somerset, England. It has a structure based on other lists of Grade I buildings and is supported by appropriate images and references. — Rod talk 14:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
Comment Out of interest, how many Grade 1 listed buildings are there in the entire county of Somerset? Matthewedwards : Chat 23:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Oppose Personally, I don't see great problems in the lede except with the number; the buildings listed are 35, but you treated 6 as a single listed building, and while it was correct to lump the six entries in a single article on the priory, it is doubtful that in a list that should present the listed buildings as English Heritage views them, and avoid to leave the issue to the original research of the wikipedian. Also, I must observe that in List of Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester the entries from English Heritage are all listed seperately.
Another source of serious objection is to me the presence in the tables of the "architect" voice: what sense does such an entry make when only two buildings have their architect known? I personally feel that this classification should be thrashed as useless, and replaced with something else: maybe, like in the featured List of listed buildings in Runcorn, it could present an image for each listed building named, and maybe, like also is present in the Runcorn list as well as every single one of the hundred listings of NRHPs.
I hope none of these of my suggestions have came out too harsh, or that I may be have seemed rude in some way; if I have let me offer my excuses to the editors of this article, whose great work on this article I by no means misunderstand or miss to appreciate.--Aldux (talk) 01:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The table should be in normal font size. You refer to List of Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester, which also has its tables in a small font. That list was promoted some 15 months ago, when less notice was taken of accessibility considerations, and for it to retain its featured status perhaps its tables should also be rendered in normal font size. A relevant guideline would be WP:MOS#Formatting issues, which says "Formatting issues such as font size, blank space and color are issues for the Wikipedia site-wide style sheet and should not be specified in articles except in special cases." Struway2 (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My hat's off to you, incidentally, on getting the date sorting worked out. And congrats on a great list. – Quadell (talk) 03:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]